Order of acquisition in learning perceptual categories: A laboratory analogue of the age-of-acquisition effect?

In the age-of-acquisition (AoA) effect, an advantage for recognition and production is found for items learned early in life, as compared with items learned later. In this laboratory analogue, participants learned to categorize novel random checkerboard stimuli. Some stimuli were presented from the onset of training; others were introduced later. At test, when early and late stimuli had equal cumulative frequency, early stimuli were classified significantly more quickly. Because stimuli were randomly assigned to be introduced either early or late, we can conclude that early stimuli were categorized more quickly because of their order of acquisition. This finding suggests that age- or order-of-acquisition effects are a general property of any learning system.

[1]  Tim Valentine,et al.  The effects of age of acquisition on object perception , 2004 .

[2]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[3]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[6]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[7]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages , 2002 .

[10]  R. Johnston,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .

[11]  Miguel A. Perez Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. Johnston,et al.  Effects of age of acquisition, age, and repetition priming on object naming , 2006 .

[13]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: a review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Jelena Havelka,et al.  Age of acquisition in naming Japanese words , 2006 .

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word reading and picture naming in Italian , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance-based account? , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[21]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  A. Ellis,et al.  What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002). , 2002 .

[26]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[27]  A. Ellis,et al.  Age of acquisition and typicality effects in three object processing tasks , 2006 .

[28]  Neil Stewart,et al.  A PC parallel port button box provides millisecond response time accuracy under Linux , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  The effects of age of acquisition on an object classification task , 2006 .

[30]  K. Lamberts Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.

[31]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[32]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[33]  Michael B. Lewis Chasing psycholinguistic effects: A cautionary tale , 2006 .

[34]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Exploring a neural-network account of age-of-acquisition effects using repetition priming of faces , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks , 2004 .

[36]  Neil Stewart Millisecond accuracy video display using OpenGL under Linux , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[38]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  The Early Word Catches the Weights , 2000, NIPS.

[39]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis , 2002 .