A three-phase model for evaluating the seismic resistance of soils reinforced by a network of symmetrically inclined piles

Abstract The stability analysis of a piled embankment under seismic loading is considered, with a special emphasis on the optimization of the reinforcement layout by splitting the initial group of vertical piles into two symmetrically inclined arrays of parallel inclusions. The bidirectionally-reinforced soil thus obtained is appropriately described, at the macroscopic scale, by a three-phase model, conceived as an extension of the two-phase model previously developed for unidirectionally-reinforced soils. The model is implemented in a finite element formulation and related numerical code, which is used for simulating the behavior of the piled embankment up to failure. The results of these simulations, which favourably compare with upper bound yield design calculations, clearly indicate that the seismic resistance of the embankment can be considerably increased from symmetrically inclining the piles, even without taking the potential benefits of their flexural resistance into account.

[1]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  A two-phase elastoplastic model for unidirectionally-reinforced materials , 1999 .

[2]  Ghazi Hassen,et al.  Seismic stability analysis of piled embankments: A multiphase approach , 2010 .

[3]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Micropolar multiphase model for materials reinforced by linear inclusions , 2000 .

[4]  M Raithel,et al.  German Recommendations for Reinforced Embankments on Pile-Similar Elements , 2008 .

[5]  Patrick de Buhan,et al.  Multiphase approach as a generalized homogenization procedure for modelling the macroscopic behaviour of soils reinforced by linear inclusions , 2008 .

[6]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Batter Piles: Elastic Response , 2010 .

[7]  George M. Filz,et al.  Influence of Clay Compressibility on Geosynthetic Loads in Bridging Layers for Column-Supported Embankments , 2005 .

[8]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Multiphase model for inclusion‐reinforced geostructures: Application to rock‐bolted tunnels and piled raft foundations , 2001 .

[9]  J. Salençon.  Handbook of continuum mechanics , 2001 .

[10]  D Russell,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN METHODS FOR PILED EMBANKMENTS , 1997 .

[11]  Ghazi Hassen,et al.  Multiphase Constitutive Model for the Design of Piled-Embankments: Comparison with Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations , 2009 .

[12]  V. Choa,et al.  Arching in Piled Embankments , 1994 .

[13]  M. Crisfield.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Essentials , 1997 .

[14]  Daniel Dias,et al.  Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of a Piled Embankment , 2009 .

[15]  P. de Buhan,et al.  Elastoplastic multiphase model for simulating the response of piled raft foundations subject to combined loadings , 2006 .

[16]  Marwan Sadek,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the seismic behavior of inclined micropiles , 2004 .

[17]  Thai Son Quang,et al.  A multiphase approach to the stability analysis of reinforced earth structures accounting for a soil–strip failure condition , 2009 .

[18]  Daniel Dias,et al.  SOFT GROUND IMPROVEMENT BY VERTICAL RIGID PILES TWO-DIMENSIONAL PHYSICAL MODELLING AND COMPARISON WITH CURRENT DESIGN METHODS , 2005 .