Developments in integrative modeling with dynamical interfaces.

Proteins are dynamic, and this holds especially for their surfaces. They display ensembles of conformations, which allows them to interact with diverse partners, often via the same patch of surface, and execute their distinct functions. Binding a specific partner can stimulate - or suppress - a distinct signaling pathway. This diversity poses a challenge: how to reliably model a specific protein-protein interaction (PPI)? This problem is compounded in protein assemblies, which are typically large, involving multiple protein-protein interfaces. Integrative modeling (IM), which combines diverse data, has emerged as the most promising strategy; however, modeling dynamical interfaces, often at the detailed level, which are at the heart of reliable predictions of assemblies, still poses a challenge. Here we review hurdles and advances in integrative modeling of dynamical interfaces; while some could have been predicted or expected, others transformed modeling in unanticipated ways. We further comment on what we believe could be possible future advances.

[1]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2012, PLoS biology.

[2]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[3]  O. Keskin,et al.  Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[4]  Brian T Chait,et al.  Revealing Higher Order Protein Structure Using Mass Spectrometry , 2016, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[5]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Large-scale mapping of human protein interactome using structural complexes , 2012, EMBO reports.

[7]  Dmitri I. Svergun,et al.  2017 publication guidelines for structural modelling of small-angle scattering data from biomolecules in solution: an update , 2017, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[8]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Geometry‐based flexible and symmetric protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[9]  Keren Lasker,et al.  Finding the right fit: chiseling structures out of cryo-electron microscopy maps. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Comparing interfacial dynamics in protein-protein complexes: an elastic network approach , 2010, BMC Structural Biology.

[11]  M. Madhusudhan,et al.  Computational modeling of protein assemblies. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  Michail Yu. Lobanov,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder in Protein Interactions: Insights From a Comprehensive Structural Analysis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry: An Integrated Technology to Understand the Structure and Function of Molecular Machines. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[15]  T. Schwede,et al.  Modeling protein quaternary structure of homo- and hetero-oligomers beyond binary interactions by homology , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Ras Conformational Ensembles, Allostery, and Signaling. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[17]  Rampi Ramprasad,et al.  Adaptive machine learning framework to accelerate ab initio molecular dynamics , 2015 .

[18]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness in Protein Interactions-A Historical Perspective. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Andrej Sali,et al.  MultiFit: a web server for fitting multiple protein structures into their electron microscopy density map , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Modeling complexes of modeled proteins , 2017, Proteins.

[21]  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny,et al.  Modeling Structure and Dynamics of Protein Complexes with SAXS Profiles. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[22]  H. Wolfson,et al.  FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking , 2010, Proteins.

[23]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  PRISM-EM: template interface-based modelling of multi-protein complexes guided by cryo-electron microscopy density maps. Corrigendum. , 2016, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[24]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  A Structural View of Negative Regulation of the Toll-like Receptor-Mediated Inflammatory Pathway. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Cristian Oscar Rohr,et al.  CoDNaS 2.0: a comprehensive database of protein conformational diversity in the native state , 2016, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[26]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[27]  Steven P. Armes,et al.  Time-Resolved SAXS Studies of the Kinetics of Thermally Triggered Release of Encapsulated Silica Nanoparticles from Block Copolymer Vesicles , 2017, Macromolecules.

[28]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Prediction of multimolecular assemblies by multiple docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Predicting protein-protein interface residues using local surface structural similarity , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[30]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[31]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Towards inferring time dimensionality in protein–protein interaction networks by integrating structures: the p53 example† †This article is part of a Molecular BioSystems themed issue on Computational and Systems Biology. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[32]  Sergey Nepomnyachiy,et al.  ConTemplate Suggests Possible Alternative Conformations for a Query Protein of Known Structure. , 2015, Structure.

[33]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Quantitative FRET studies and integrative modeling unravel the structure and dynamics of biomolecular systems. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Non-Redundant Unique Interface Structures as Templates for Modeling Protein Interactions , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Insights from molecular dynamics simulations for computational protein design. , 2017, Molecular systems design & engineering.

[36]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Exploiting conformational ensembles in modeling protein-protein interactions on the proteome scale. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[37]  Jonathan R. Karr,et al.  A blueprint for human whole-cell modeling. , 2018, Current opinion in systems biology.

[38]  Seung Joong Kim,et al.  Molecular Architecture of the Major Membrane Ring Component of the Nuclear Pore Complex. , 2017, Structure.

[39]  Andy M. Lau,et al.  Surface Accessibility and Dynamics of Macromolecular Assemblies Probed by Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry and Integrative Modeling , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[40]  Paul A Bates,et al.  Flexible Protein-Protein Docking with SwarmDock. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[41]  Emel Sen Kilic,et al.  Enriching Traditional Protein-protein Interaction Networks with Alternative Conformations of Proteins , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Paul A. Bates,et al.  Predicting improved protein conformations with a temporal deep recurrent neural network , 2018, bioRxiv.

[43]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  PRISM-EM: template interface-based modelling of multi-protein complexes guided by cryo-electron microscopy density maps. , 2016, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[44]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Attila Gursoy,et al.  Advances in template-based protein docking by utilizing interfaces towards completing structural interactome. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  Justin L MacCallum,et al.  The emerging role of physical modeling in the future of structure determination. , 2018, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  Chun Tang,et al.  Conjoined Use of EM and NMR in RNA Structure Refinement , 2015, PloS one.

[48]  Joachim Frank,et al.  Time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy: Recent progress. , 2017, Journal of structural biology.

[49]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Adaptability of protein structures to enable functional interactions and evolutionary implications. , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  PRISM: a web server and repository for prediction of protein–protein interactions and modeling their 3D complexes , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  David W Ritchie,et al.  PDB-wide identification of biological assemblies from conserved quaternary structure geometry , 2017, Nature Methods.

[52]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Relating Three-Dimensional Structures to Protein Networks Provides Evolutionary Insights , 2006, Science.

[53]  Helen M Berman,et al.  Development of a Prototype System for Archiving Integrative/Hybrid Structure Models of Biological Macromolecules. , 2018, Structure.

[54]  H. Wolfson,et al.  A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[55]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Integrative structure modeling with IMP , 2017 .

[56]  Jens Meiler,et al.  BCL::MP-fold: folding membrane proteins through assembly of transmembrane helices. , 2013, Structure.

[57]  Mayya Sedova,et al.  PDBFlex: exploring flexibility in protein structures , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[58]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Unraveling the molecular mechanism of interactions of the Rho GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 with the scaffolding protein IQGAP2 , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.