Overnight closed loop insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: crossover randomised controlled studies

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of overnight closed loop delivery of insulin (artificial pancreas) with conventional insulin pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. Design Two sequential, open label, randomised controlled crossover, single centre studies. Setting Clinical research facility. Participants 24 adults (10 men, 14 women) with type 1 diabetes, aged 18-65, who had used insulin pump therapy for at least three months: 12 were tested after consuming a medium sized meal and the other 12 after consuming a larger meal accompanied by alcohol. Intervention During overnight closed loop delivery, sensor measurements of glucose were fed into a computer algorithm, which advised on insulin pump infusion rates at 15 minute intervals. During control nights, conventional insulin pump settings were applied. One study compared closed loop delivery of insulin with conventional pump therapy after a medium sized evening meal (60 g of carbohydrates) at 1900, depicting the scenario of “eating in.” The other study was carried out after a later large evening meal (100 g of carbohydrates) at 2030, accompanied by white wine (0.75 g/kg ethanol) and depicted the scenario of “eating out.” Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the time plasma glucose levels were in target (3.91-8.0 mmol/L) during closed loop delivery and a comparable control period. Secondary outcomes included pooled data analysis and time plasma glucose levels were below target (≤3.9 mmol/L). Results For the eating in scenario, overnight closed loop delivery of insulin increased the time plasma glucose levels were in target by a median 15% (interquartile range 3-35%), P=0.002. For the eating out scenario, closed loop delivery increased the time plasma glucose levels were in target by a median 28% (2-39%), P=0.01. Analysis of pooled data showed that the overall time plasma glucose was in target increased by a median 22% (3-37%) with closed loop delivery (P<0.001). Closed loop delivery reduced overnight time spent hypoglycaemic (plasma glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L) by a median 3% (0-20%), P=0.04, and eliminated plasma glucose concentrations below 3.0 mmol/L after midnight. Conclusion These two small crossover trials suggest that closed loop delivery of insulin may improve overnight control of glucose levels and reduce the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00910767 and NCT00944619.

[1]  R. Camerini‐Davalos PREVENTION OF DIABETES MELLITUS. , 1965, The Medical clinics of North America.

[2]  W. F. Taylor,et al.  Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions, a Measure of Diabetic Instability , 1970, Diabetes.

[3]  Amir Averbuch,et al.  Interacting Multiple Model Methods in Target Tracking: A Survey , 1988 .

[4]  Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  B P Kovatchev,et al.  Assessment of risk for severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM: validation of the low blood glucose index. , 1998, Diabetes care.

[7]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Worldwide increase in incidence of Type I diabetes – the analysis of the data on published incidence trends , 1999, Diabetologia.

[8]  David Kerr,et al.  The effect of evening alcohol consumption on next-morning glucose control in type 1 diabetes. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[9]  John Pickup,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at 25 years: evidence base for the expanding use of insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[10]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Partitioning glucose distribution/transport, disposal, and endogenous production during IVGTT. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  S. Heller,et al.  Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  R. Sherwin,et al.  Influence of alcohol on cognitive performance during mild hypoglycaemia; implications for Type 1 diabetes , 2004, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[13]  D. Klonoff Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[14]  Bruce W Bode,et al.  Glycemic characteristics in continuously monitored patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: normative values. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[15]  B. Bequette A critical assessment of algorithms and challenges in the development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  G. Steil,et al.  Closed-loop insulin delivery – what lies between where we are and where we are going? , 2005, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[17]  E Renard,et al.  Artificial beta-cell: clinical experience toward an implantable closed-loop insulin delivery system. , 2006, Diabetes & metabolism.

[18]  R. Hovorka Continuous glucose monitoring and closed‐loop systems , 2006, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[19]  P. Cryer The Barrier of Hypoglycemia in Diabetes , 2008, Diabetes.

[20]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  The use of an Energy Monitor in the management of diabetes: a pilot study. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  C. C. Palerm,et al.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Using a Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor and Intraperitoneal Insulin Delivery , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[22]  Aaron J. Kowalski,et al.  Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[23]  F. Ovalle,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009 .

[24]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[25]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Suspended insulin infusion during overnight closed‐loop glucose control in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes , 2010, Diabetic Medicine.

[26]  George Dailey,et al.  Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Robert G. Sutherlin,et al.  A Bihormonal Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas for Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[28]  E. Atlas,et al.  MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas System , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[29]  W. Kenneth Ward,et al.  Novel Use of Glucagon in a Closed-Loop System for Prevention of Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[30]  E. Atlas,et al.  MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas System: A Pilot Study in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Running Title: Closed-Loop System In Type 1 Diabetes , 2010 .

[31]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[32]  L. Magni,et al.  Multinational Study of Subcutaneous Model-Predictive Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Summary of the Results , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.