Towards the Simplicity of Complex Interfaces: Applying Ephemeral Adaptation to Enhance User Performance and Satisfaction

In interface design of complex information systems, there is a well-known trade-off between transparently communicating all possible user actions, and not creating information overload by only communicating those actions that are relevant for a specific user at a specific point. Differences in user expertise can provide further challenges to interaction design, as no one-size-fits-all solution accommodates all user types. A solution to this is ephemeral adaptation, a symbiotic system in which attention is steered towards relevant items by making them appear immediately, while other items fade in over time. To date, this concept has only been tested in a simple set-up with drop-down menu’s, where the usability outcome measures were measured immediately after initial exposure to the interface. Ephemeral adaptation was applied within complex software, allowing an exploration of its potential value and evaluations on usability over time. Results showed increased performance of novice users, showing potential benefits of ephemeral adaptation.

[1]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Dips and ceilings: understanding and supporting transitions to expertise in user interfaces , 2011, CHI.

[2]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance , 2009, CHI.

[3]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Personalized Persuasion , 2012, Psychological science.

[4]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Can You Be Persuaded? Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2009, INTERACT.

[5]  Ryo Sakai,et al.  Personalized Persuasion in Ambient Intelligence: The APStairs System , 2011, AmI.

[6]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces , 2014, ACM Comput. Surv..

[7]  Daniel S. Weld,et al.  Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces , 2006, AVI '06.

[8]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[9]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An Investigation of Metrics for the In Situ Detection of Software Expertise , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[11]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines , 2009, CHI.

[12]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Personalization in HRI: A longitudinal field experiment , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Beyond performance: Feature awareness in personalized interfaces , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Privender Saini,et al.  Individual Differences in Persuadability in the Health Promotion Domain , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Skillometers: reflective widgets that motivate and help users to improve performance , 2013, UIST.

[16]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces , 2008, CHI.