Attack Robustness and Centrality of Complex Networks

Many complex systems can be described by networks, in which the constituent components are represented by vertices and the connections between the components are represented by edges between the corresponding vertices. A fundamental issue concerning complex networked systems is the robustness of the overall system to the failure of its constituent parts. Since the degree to which a networked system continues to function, as its component parts are degraded, typically depends on the integrity of the underlying network, the question of system robustness can be addressed by analyzing how the network structure changes as vertices are removed. Previous work has considered how the structure of complex networks change as vertices are removed uniformly at random, in decreasing order of their degree, or in decreasing order of their betweenness centrality. Here we extend these studies by investigating the effect on network structure of targeting vertices for removal based on a wider range of non-local measures of potential importance than simply degree or betweenness. We consider the effect of such targeted vertex removal on model networks with different degree distributions, clustering coefficients and assortativity coefficients, and for a variety of empirical networks.

[1]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[4]  V. Latora,et al.  Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance , 2002, cond-mat/0205601.

[5]  D. Lusseau,et al.  The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Maria A. Kazandjieva,et al.  A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Harry Dym,et al.  Linear Algebra in Action , 2006, Graduate Studies in Mathematics.

[9]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[12]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[14]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[15]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms , 1984, JACM.

[16]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. A. Beauchamp AN IMPROVED INDEX OF CENTRALITY. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[18]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[19]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[20]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[21]  J. Hopcroft,et al.  Are randomly grown graphs really random? , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[24]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Evolution of robust network topologies: Emergence of central backbones , 2012, Physical review letters.

[25]  I. Sokolov,et al.  Reshuffling scale-free networks: from random to assortative. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[27]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[28]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Reuven Cohen,et al.  Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[30]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[31]  Cohen,et al.  Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns , 2000, Physical review letters.

[32]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[33]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[34]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[35]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[36]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[37]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Attack vulnerability of complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.