Blood glucose self-monitoring in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' perspectives.

BACKGROUND Self-monitoring of blood glucose is controversial in the management of type 2 diabetes. Some research suggests that self-monitoring improves glycaemic control, whereas other research is sceptical about its value for people with type 2 diabetes who are not on insulin. Although blood glucose meters are widely available and used by this group, patients' own views are absent from the debate. AIM To explore the pros and cons of glucose monitoring from the patients' perspectives. DESIGN OF STUDY Qualitative repeat-interview study. SETTING Patients were recruited from 16 general practices and three hospital clinics within four local healthcare cooperatives in Lothian, Scotland. METHOD Interview data from 40 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the previous 6 months were analysed using thematic analysis informed by grounded theory. We report findings from round 1 and round 2 interviews. RESULTS Glucose monitoring can heighten patients' awareness of the impact of lifestyle; for example, dietary choices, on blood glucose levels. Glucose monitoring amplifies a sense of 'success' or 'failure' about self-management, often resulting in anxiety and self-blame if glucose readings remain consistently high. Moreover, monitoring can negatively effect patients' self-management when readings are counter-intuitive. CONCLUSION Our analysis highlights the importance of understanding the meanings that newly diagnosed patients attach to glucose self-monitoring. To maximise the positive effects of self-monitoring, health professionals should ensure that patients understand the purpose of monitoring and should clarify with patients how readings should be interpreted.

[1]  Odette Parry,et al.  Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a qualitative analysis of patients' emotional reactions and views about information provision. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[2]  R. Noth,et al.  Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 2 diabetes results in cost savings and no change in glycemic control. , 2002, The American journal of managed care.

[3]  Prenatal development of lumbar intervertebral articulation. , 1982, Folia morphologica.

[4]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[5]  Glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes. , 2001, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[6]  O. Parry,et al.  Patients in waiting: a qualitative study of type 2 diabetes patients' perceptions of diagnosis. , 2004, Family practice.

[7]  S H Kaplan,et al.  The impact of blood glucose self-monitoring on metabolic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: an urgent need for better educational strategies. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[8]  K. Alberti,et al.  Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin-dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring: results of a controlled trial. , 1982 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[10]  D. Ruta,et al.  Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database , 1999, BMJ.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[12]  M Gallichan,et al.  Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  D. Boyle,et al.  The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (darts) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register , 1997, BMJ.

[14]  G. Mertes,et al.  Meal-related structured self-monitoring of blood glucose: effect on diabetes control in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[15]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research , 1995 .

[16]  C. Fox,et al.  What makes people with diabetes measure their own blood glucose , 1994 .

[17]  A Williams,et al.  Living with diabetes: issues for nursing practice. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  J. Rindone,et al.  Effect of home blood glucose monitoring on the management of patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting. , 1997, The American journal of managed care.

[19]  M. Harris,et al.  Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[20]  G. Watt,et al.  Lay constructions of a family history of heart disease: potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter? , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  N. Britten,et al.  Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. , 1995, Family practice.

[22]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Self‐monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis , 2000, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[23]  L. Robins,et al.  How Do We Know? Reflections on qualitative research in diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[24]  G. Slama,et al.  Is glucose self-monitoring beneficial in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients? Results of a randomized comparative trial. , 1989, Diabete & metabolisme.

[25]  F. Schellevis,et al.  The Efficacy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in NIDDM subjects: A criteria-based literature review , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[26]  A. Patrick,et al.  Home Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes: Is It a Waste of Time? , 1994, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.