Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients

Construction clients exert direct and indirect influences on the potential of construction projects to generate innovative solutions. Understanding their innovation adoption behaviour is thus crucial for the successful diffusion of new ideas. Although it is acknowledged that clients can support as well as suppress construction innovation, little is known about the circumstances that form their innovation adoption behaviour. On the basis of a client classification scheme and three cases of innovative construction projects in the Netherlands, the factors that constitute the adoption decision environment of professional public clients were investigated. A key finding is that professional public clients will adopt a new idea if they perceive that it performs better in meeting social requirements than traditional solutions, without compromising the client's social responsibilities. This perception is formed only if public professional clients rely on project-independent knowledge in order to cope with the project-dependent uncertainty. The diversity of construction clients in terms of needs, experiences and motivations largely influences the potential of construction innovations to be implemented. Moreover, innovating firms need to address the complex decision environment of construction clients more consciously. Dans le secteur de la construction, les clients exercent des influences directes et indirectes sur la capacité des projets de construction à générer des solutions innovantes. Il est essentiel de bien comprendre leur comportement en ce qui concerne l'adoption d'innovations pour la bonne diffusion d'idées nouvelles. Bien que l'on admette que les clients puissent également contribuer à la suppression de l'innovation dans la construction, on connaît peu les circonstances qui façonnent leur comportement lorsqu'il s'agit d'adopter des innovations. Sur la base d'un système de classement des clients et de trois cas de projets de construction novateurs aux Pays-Bas, on a étudié les facteurs qui constituent l'environnement dans lequel les clients professionnels du secteur public prennent leur décision d'adopter des innovations. Selon un résultat intéressant, les clients professionnels du secteur public adoptent une idée nouvelle s'ils ressentent qu'elle répondra mieux à des exigences sociales que les solutions traditionnelles, sans compromettre leurs responsabilités sociales. Cette perception n'existe que si les professionnels du secteur public s'appuient sur une connaissance indépendante du projet pour répondre à l'incertitude qui dépend du projet. La diversité des clients du secteur de la construction en termes de besoin, d'expériences et de motivations a une influence importante sur la capacité du secteur de la construction à mettre en œuvre des innovations. De plus, les entreprises innovantes ont besoin d'aborder de façon plus consciente l'environnement décisionnel complexe des clients du secteur de la construction. Mots clés: comportement du client, clients du secteur de la construction, environnement décisionnel, innovation, secteur public, innovation technologique

[1]  Karen Manley,et al.  Exploring the drivers of firm‐level innovation in the construction industry , 2006 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[3]  Andreas Hartmann,et al.  The context of innovation management in construction firms , 2006 .

[4]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[5]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  C. Midden,et al.  INNOVATING ‘DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION’ THEORY: INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENTION OF UTILITY COMPANIES TO ADOPT ENERGY CONSERVATION INTERVENTIONS , 2002 .

[7]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[8]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of Solar Energy Systems , 1981 .

[9]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[10]  Ian Miles,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector Publin Report No . D 9 On the differences between public and private sector innovation , 2005 .

[11]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Leaders and champions for construction innovation , 1997 .

[12]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Networks and Innovation: Sustainable Technologies in Scottish Social Housing , 2004 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[14]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Understanding the construction client , 2006 .

[15]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[16]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[17]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation: An Exploratory Model , 1990 .

[18]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[19]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Managing the implementation of construction innovations , 2003 .

[20]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[21]  Nicholas S. Vonortas The Process of Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[22]  Alon Peled,et al.  Network, coalition and institution - The politics of technological innovation in the public sector , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[23]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[24]  N. Schillewaert,et al.  Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research , 2002 .

[25]  Lyman E. Ostlund Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness , 1974 .

[26]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[27]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[28]  Frens Pries,et al.  Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment , 1995 .

[29]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  INNOVATION TYPE AND DIFFUSION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT , 2006 .

[30]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[31]  J. Nash,et al.  Strategic decisions and innovation in construction firms , 2003 .

[32]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[33]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations , 2006 .

[34]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[35]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[36]  Karen Manley,et al.  The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry , 2006 .

[37]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[38]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[39]  S. Borins,et al.  Leadership and innovation in the public sector , 2002 .

[40]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change , 1998 .

[41]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Innovation attributes and category membership: Explaining intention to adopt technological innovations in strategic decision making contexts , 1998 .

[42]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Motivating small construction companies to adopt new technology , 2006 .

[43]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managing Invention and Innovation , 2007 .

[44]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Influences on Innovation Benefits during Implementation: Client’s Perspective , 2007 .

[45]  A. L. Wilson,et al.  Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology , 2002 .

[46]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[47]  Chris Ivory,et al.  The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client‐focused construction industry? , 2005 .

[48]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[49]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[50]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[51]  J. Cockcroft The process of technological innovation , 1965 .