Comparative Analysis of Three Digital Signal Processing Techniques for 2D Combination of Echographic Traces Obtained from Ultrasonic Transducers Located at Perpendicular Planes

In certain practical cases of quality control in the manufacturing industry, by means of ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation (NDE), it is very difficult to detect certain types of internal flaw using conventional instrumentation based in ultrasonic transducers located on a unique external surface of the piece under inspection. In these cases, the detection problems are due to the especial flaws orientation or their spatial location, and some technological solutions for it are still pendent to be proposed. In addition, it is convenient, in a more general scope, to improve the flaw-location in two dimensions, by using several ultrasonic transducers emitting beams from distinct places. In fact, the utilization of more than one detection transducer provides complementary information in the NDE of many pieces. These transducers can be located at the same or at different planes depending on the piece shape and the detection necessities. In any case, the result of such arrangement is a set of ultrasonic traces, which have to be carefully fussed using digital signal processing techniques in order to extract more accurate and more complete detection results. The usual trend for reducing the mentioned limitations in flaw detection is to increase the number of ultrasonic channels involved in the testing. On the other hand, it is important to reduce this ultrasonic channels number in order to minimize technological costs. In addition, it should be noted that the detection capability also depends on other important factors, because, from a more general point of view, still some physical limitations of the ultrasonic beams remain for a) certain angles of the scanning (Chang and Hsieh 2002), b) for certain complex geometries of the industrial components to be tested (Roy et al 1999) or c) for biological elements in medical diagnosis (Defontaine et al 2004, Reguieg et al 2006). Schemes have been preliminarily proposed in order to improve flaw detection in difficult conditions, trying to resolve these type of aspects well with two transducers and additional digital signal processing of echoes (Chang and Hsieh 2002), or well with several arrays of few elements (Engl and Meier 2002). Other posterior alternative proposals, based on perpendicular scanning from two planes with a reduced transducers number and ultrasonic

[1]  A. Trous,et al.  The Discrete Wavelet Transform: Wedding the . , 1992 .

[2]  J. C. Lázaro,et al.  Ultrasonic flaw detection in NDE of highly scattering materials using wavelet and Wigner-Ville transform processing. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[3]  F. Hlawatsch,et al.  Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal representations , 1992, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  A. Ramos,et al.  Multiple flaws location by means of NDE ultrasonic arrays placed at perpendicular planes , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[5]  F. Padilla,et al.  P3F-5 Ultrasonic Transmission Device Based On Crossed Beam Forming , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[6]  S. Mahaut,et al.  Application of Ultrasonic Beam Modeling to Phased Array Testing of Complex Geometry Components , 1999 .

[7]  J. Saniie,et al.  Performance comparison of time-frequency distributions for ultrasonic nondestructive testing , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[8]  A. Ramos,et al.  Flaw location from perpendicular NDE ultrasonic transducers using the wavelet packet transform , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[9]  A. W. Meyer,et al.  Iterative processing of ultrasonic measurements to characterize flaws in critical optical components , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  J. C. Lázaro,et al.  Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[12]  T. Claasen,et al.  THE WIGNER DISTRIBUTION - A TOOL FOR TIME-FREQUENCY SIGNAL ANALYSIS , 1980 .

[13]  J. L. San Emeterio,et al.  Localization of isolate flaws by combination of noised signals detected from perpendicular transducers , 2004 .

[14]  Khaled H. Hamed,et al.  Time-frequency analysis , 2003 .

[15]  Cheng-I Hsieh,et al.  Time of flight diffraction imaging for double-probe technique. , 2002, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[16]  Miguel A. Rodriguez-Hernandez,et al.  Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation with spatial combination of Wigner–Ville Transforms , 2003 .

[17]  R. Meier,et al.  Testing large aerospace CFRP components by ultrasonic multichannel conventional and phased array pulse-echo techniques , 2003 .

[18]  M Defontaine,et al.  2D arrays device for calcaneus bone transmission: an alternative technological solution using crossed beam forming. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[19]  C. H. Chen,et al.  On the Use of Wigner Distribution in Ultrasonic NDE , 1992 .

[20]  E. Pardo,et al.  Shift Invariant Wavelet Denoising of Ultrasonic Traces , 2008 .

[21]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.