Phonemic coding might result from sensory-motor coupling dynamics

Human sound systems are invariably phone-mically coded. Furthermore, phoneme inventories follow very particular tendancies. To explain these phenomena, there existed so far three kinds of approaches : "Chomskyan"/cognitive innatism, morpho-perceptual innatism and the more recent approach of "language as a complex cultural system which adapts under the pressure of efficient communication". The two first approaches are clearly not satisfying, while the third, even if much more convincing, makes a lot of speculative assumptions and did not really bring answers to the question of phonemic coding. We propose here a new hypothesis based on a low-level model of sensory-motor interactions. We show that certain very simple and non language-specific neural devices allow a population of agents to build signalling systems without any functional pressure. Moreover, these systems are phonemically coded. Using a realistic vowel articulatory synthesizer, we show that the inventories of vowels have striking similarities with human vowel systems.

[1]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  James A. Reggia,et al.  A Competitive Distribution Theory of Neocortical Dynamics , 1992, Neural Computation.

[3]  Bart G. de Boer Investigating the Emergence of Speech Sounds , 1999, IJCAI.

[4]  Simon Kirby,et al.  The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Syntax Without Natural Selection: How Compositionality Emerges from Vocabulary in a Population of Learners , 2000 .

[5]  G. S. Watson,et al.  Smooth regression analysis , 1964 .

[6]  Robert I. Damper,et al.  Ontogenetic versus phylogenetic learning in the emergence of phonetic categories , 2000 .

[7]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[8]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three- dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural network models of categorical perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Luc Steels,et al.  The synthetic modeling of language origins , 1997 .

[11]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[12]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  The Origins of Syllable Systems: An Operational Model , 2001 .

[13]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Approaches to the Evolution of Language , 1999 .

[14]  F. Guenther,et al.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Pietro G. Morasso,et al.  Coordinate-free sensorimotor processing: computing with population codes , 1998, Neural Networks.

[17]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[18]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[19]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons , 1977, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Coupled Neural Maps for the Origins of Vowel Systems , 2001, ICANN.

[21]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems , 1997 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .