Performance Analysis of Mobility Support in IPv4/IPv6 Mixed Wireless Networks

The rapid growth of the Internet has led to the anticipated depletion of addresses in the current version of the Internet protocol (IP), i.e., IPv4. This depletion has given rise to a newer version of the IP, i.e., IP version 6 (IPv6). IPv6 provides sufficient address space to meet the predicted increase of the Internet. Since IPv4 has already widely been deployed, it is required that the existing IPv4 and the newly added IPv6 can coexist and interoperate. Due to the incompatibility of the IPv4 and IPv6 headers, various mechanisms have been proposed to support the interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6. However, they are mostly designed for a static environment. Mobility support of mobile terminals in a mixed IPv4/IPv6 environment remains largely unexplored. It introduces additional overhead and delay to communications. In this paper, we analyze various handoff scenarios for a dual-stack mobile node with a predominant IPv6 home address roaming in a mixed IPv4/IPv6 environment. We investigate how handoffs can be supported and derive the handoff procedures for all scenarios. In addition, we analyze the impact of mobility support on the system performance in terms of handoff-signaling cost, handoff delay, and handoff-failure probability using our designed analytical models. Different traffic and mobility patterns are taken into account in the performance analysis. Numerical results are provided to demonstrate the performance of all handoff scenarios. Conclusions from this study can give great in-depth understanding and insights into designing new cost-effective mobility support mechanisms for IPv4/IPv6 transition and interoperability.

[1]  Jiang Xie,et al.  IEEE 802.11-Based Mobile IP Fast Handoff Latency Analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[2]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification , 1995, RFC.

[3]  Hesham Soliman,et al.  Dual-Stack Mobile IPv4 , 2009, RFC.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[5]  Brian E. Carpenter,et al.  Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Modeling PCS networks under general call holding time and cell residence time distributions , 1997, TNET.

[7]  David Thaler,et al.  Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) , 2005, RFC.

[8]  Joe Finney,et al.  Mobile 4-in-6: a novel IPv4 / IPv6 transitioning mechanism for mobile hosts , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[9]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 1996, RFC.

[10]  Erik Nordmark,et al.  Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers , 1996, RFC.

[11]  Giorgio Ventre,et al.  Measurement of processing and queuing delays introduced by an open-source router in a single-hop network , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Hesham Soliman,et al.  Mobile IPv6: Mobility in a Wireless Internet , 2004 .

[13]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[14]  Brian E. Carpenter,et al.  Transmission of IPv6 over IPv4 Domains without Explicit Tunnels , 1999, RFC.

[15]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Route Optimization for Mobile IP , 1998, Cluster Computing.

[16]  Hsu-Yung Cheng,et al.  Implementing Automatic Location Update for Follow-Me Database Using VoIP and Bluetooth Technologies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[17]  Jiang Xie,et al.  Case Study of Mobility Support for IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms Over IPv6 Backbone Networks , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[18]  Wei Liang,et al.  On performance analysis of challenge/response based authentication in wireless networks , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Jim Bound Dual Stack IPv6 Dominant Transition Mechanism (DSTM) , 2005 .

[20]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Local anchor scheme for reducing signaling costs in personal communications networks , 1996, TNET.