Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance

Abstract This research attempts to extrapolate the results of education research about computer usage and IS research about technology acceptance to e-learning. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the objectives of this study are to explore gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants affecting e-learning acceptance. A survey of 67 female and 89 male employees taken from six international companies at the Hsin-Chu Science-based Industrial Park in Taiwan shows that men’s rating of computer self-efficacy, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention to use e-learning are all higher than women’s. Additionally, we found that women were more strongly influenced by perceptions of computer self-efficacy and ease of use, and that men’s usage decisions were more significantly influenced by their perception of usefulness of e-learning. These findings also suggest that researchers should take into consideration factors of gender in the development and testing of e-learning theories. Managers and co-workers, moreover, should realize that e-learning may be perceived differently by women and men. Based on these findings, implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[3]  A. Colley,et al.  The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes , 1997 .

[4]  S. Fiske,et al.  What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. , 1993 .

[5]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[6]  P. Okebukola,et al.  The gender factor in computer anxiety and interest among some Australian high school students , 1993 .

[7]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[8]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania , 2000 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[10]  Matthew M. Maurer,et al.  Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review , 1994 .

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Gender and computers: similarities and differences in Iranian college students' attitudes toward computers , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[15]  Tom Barron,et al.  Getting IT Support for E-Learning , 2000 .

[16]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[17]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Thavamalar Govindasamy,et al.  Successful implementation of e-Learning: Pedagogical considerations , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Valerie A. Clarke,et al.  A computer attitude scale for secondary students , 1994 .

[22]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[23]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Influence of Computer Attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT Usage Behavior , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[24]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[25]  Leslie J. Francis,et al.  The relationship between computer related attitudes and gender stereotyping of computer use , 1994 .

[26]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[27]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[28]  Alex Koohang,et al.  A study of attitudes toward computers: anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness , 1987 .

[29]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[31]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[32]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  John Todman,et al.  Primary children and teachers' attitudes to computers , 1993 .

[35]  Marie-Thérèse Claes,et al.  Women, men and management styles , 1999 .

[36]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[39]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[40]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  B. Whitley Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[42]  R. Abouserie,et al.  Cognitive Style, Gender, Attitude toward Computer‐assisted Learning and Academic Achievement , 1992 .

[43]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[44]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Mohd Hishamuddin Harun Integrating e-Learning into the workplace , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[46]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[47]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  A. Durndell,et al.  Gender and computing: a decade of change? , 1997 .

[51]  Johan Ismail,et al.  The design of an e-learning system: Beyond the hype , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[52]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .