A novel decoupling dynamic method with third-order accuracy and controllable dissipation

Abstract In this paper, an efficient explicit integration method with third-order accuracy and controllable dissipation properties is proposed, and a new accuracy criterion is presented to evaluate relative errors of integration methods. By using this method, a desirable accuracy for responses in the low-frequency domain can be attained, spurious vibrations in the high-frequency domain can be strongly suppressed. Moreover, for the proposed method, update values of the displacement and velocity do not depend on the new state. Hence, it is convenient for decoupling a multi-spring coupling dynamic system to achieve high computational efficiency. The standard formulations of the proposed method, including the second-order and third-order accuracy schemes, are derived by discussing the local truncation error, difference accuracy, and stability firstly. Subsequently, the accuracy properties of the proposed method, e.g., the period elongation and amplitude decay, are analyzed in comparison with other available state-of-the-art explicit integration methods. Additionally, the properties of the proposed method, including the accuracy, convergence, dissipation, efficiency, and nonlinearity, are evaluated by using three examples. More specifically, the accuracy and convergence are evaluated through an example with theoretical solutions; the dissipation and efficiency are investigated by analyzing a geodesic dome truss; and the effectiveness in terms of the nonlinearity is investigated via a typical nonlinear dynamic system.

[1]  William G. Gray,et al.  Fourth-order accurate one-step integration methods with large imaginary stability limits , 1986 .

[2]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  Higher derivative explicit one step methods for non‐linear dynamic problems. Part I: Design and theory , 1990 .

[3]  H. Askes,et al.  Unified finite element methodology for gradient elasticity , 2015 .

[4]  K. Bathe,et al.  On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics , 2005 .

[5]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics , 1977 .

[6]  Amir Hossein Namadchi,et al.  Explicit dynamic analysis using Dynamic Relaxation method , 2016 .

[7]  Aram Soroushian,et al.  A unified starting procedure for the Houbolt method , 2006 .

[8]  K. Bathe,et al.  Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics , 2012 .

[9]  Daining Fang,et al.  A novel sub-step composite implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics , 2017 .

[10]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real‐time substructure testing , 2005 .

[11]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[12]  Ludovic Noels,et al.  Comparative study of numerical explicit schemes for impact problems , 2008 .

[13]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A new family of explicit time integration methods for linear and non‐linear structural dynamics , 1994 .

[14]  J. Lambert Computational Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations , 1973 .

[15]  Gérard Rio,et al.  Comparative study of numerical explicit time integration algorithms , 2002, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[16]  A. Idesman,et al.  The use of the local truncation error for the increase in accuracy of the linear finite elements for heat transfer problems , 2017 .

[17]  Peng Yuan,et al.  Time Integration Method with High Accuracy and Efficiency for Structural Dynamic Analysis , 2019, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

[18]  Bertrand Tchamwa Contribution a l'etude des methodes d'integration directe explicites en dynamique non lineaire des structures , 1997 .

[19]  J. Verwer Explicit Runge-Kutta methods for parabolic partial differential equations , 1996 .

[20]  T. Hughes,et al.  Collocation, dissipation and [overshoot] for time integration schemes in structural dynamics , 1978 .

[21]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  A finite element method enriched for wave propagation problems , 2012 .

[22]  Bin Wu,et al.  Stability of central difference method for dynamic real‐time substructure testing , 2009 .

[23]  M. Rezaiee-Pajand,et al.  A family of second-order fully explicit time integration schemes , 2018 .

[24]  M. Dokainish,et al.  A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics—I. Explicit methods , 1989 .

[25]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  TWO SIMPLE FAST INTEGRATION METHODS FOR LARGE‐SCALE DYNAMIC PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING , 1996 .

[26]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Suppression of spurious intermediate frequency modes in under‐integrated elements by combined stiffness/viscous stabilization , 2005 .

[27]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[28]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Instability analysis of space trusses , 1983 .

[29]  K. Bathe,et al.  An explicit time integration scheme for the analysis of wave propagations , 2013 .

[30]  Peng Yuan,et al.  An efficient decoupling dynamic algorithm for coupled multi-spring-systems , 2018, Computers & Structures.

[31]  S. Shojaee,et al.  An unconditionally stable implicit time integration algorithm , 2015 .

[32]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[33]  H. L. Cox,et al.  Transient Analysis of Forced Vibrations of Complex Structural-Mechanical Systems , 1962, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[34]  Wooram Kim,et al.  An improved explicit time integration method for linear and nonlinear structural dynamics , 2018, Computers & Structures.