Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools.

UNLABELLED In the frame of the French national research program PRIMEQUAL (inter-ministry program for better air quality in urban environments), measurements of outdoor and indoor pollution have been carried out in eight schools in La Rochelle (France) and its suburbs. The buildings were naturally ventilated by opening the windows, or mechanically ventilated, and showed various air permeabilities. Ozone, nitrogen oxides (NO and NO(2)), and airborne particle (particle counts within 15 size intervals ranging from 0.3 to 15 mum) concentrations were continuously monitored indoors and outdoors for two 2-week periods. The indoor humidity, temperature, CO(2) concentration (an indicator of occupancy), window openings and building permeability were also measured. The temporal profiles of indoor and outdoor concentrations show ozone and nitrogen oxides behave differently: NO and NO(2) indoor/outdoor concentration ratios (I/O) were found to vary in a range from 0.5 to 1, and from 0.88 to 1, respectively, but no correlation with building permeability was observed. On the contrary, I/O ratios of ozone vary in a range from 0 to 0.45 and seem to be strongly influenced by the building air-tightness: the more airtight the building envelope, the lower the ratio. Occupancy, through re-suspension of previously deposited particles and possible particle generation, strongly influences the indoor concentration level of airborne particles. However, this influence decreases with particle size, reflecting the way deposition velocities vary as a function of size. The influence of particle size on deposition and penetration across the building envelope is also discussed by analyzing the I/O ratios measured when the buildings were unoccupied, by comparing the indoor concentrations measured when the buildings were occupied and when they were not (O/U ratios), and by referring to previously published studies focussing on this topic. Except one case, I/O were found to vary in the range from 0.03 to 1.79. All O/U are greater than one and increase up to 100 with particle size. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Assessing children's total exposure requires the knowledge of outdoor and indoor air contaminant concentrations. The study presented here provides data on compared outdoor and indoor concentration levels in school buildings, as well as information on the parameters influencing the relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality. It may be used as a basis for estimating indoor concentrations from outdoor concentrations data, or as a first step in designing buildings sheltering children against atmospheric pollution.

[1]  Charles J. Weschler,et al.  Experiments probing the influence of air exchange rates on secondary organic aerosols derived from indoor chemistry , 2003 .

[2]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Removal of reactive gases at indoor surfaces: Combining mass transport and surface kinetics , 1993 .

[3]  C J Weschler,et al.  Ozone in indoor environments: concentration and chemistry. , 2000, Indoor air.

[4]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence , 1995 .

[5]  Christopher Y.H. Chao,et al.  Comparison between indoor and outdoor air contaminant levels in residential buildings from passive sampler study , 2001 .

[6]  De-Ling Liu,et al.  Modeling pollutant penetration across building envelopes , 2001 .

[7]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The relationship between indoor and outdoor airborne particles in the residential environment , 2001 .

[8]  S C Lee,et al.  Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at schools in Hong Kong. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[9]  W. H. Engelmann,et al.  The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  P. L. Jenkins,et al.  Activity patterns of Californians: Use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources , 1992 .

[11]  Roger Perry,et al.  Indoor air quality in homes, offices and restaurants in Korean urban areas—indoor/outdoor relationships , 1997 .

[12]  S. Lee,et al.  Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at six residential buildings in Hong Kong , 1999 .

[13]  H. N. Jow,et al.  Indoor-outdoor relationships for airborne particulate matter of outdoor origin , 1979 .

[14]  Ari Asmi,et al.  Indoor air measurement campaign in Helsinki, Finland 1999 – the effect of outdoor air pollution on indoor air , 2001 .

[15]  Terje Grøntoft,et al.  Dry deposition of ozone on building materials. Chamber measurements and modelling of the time-dependent deposition , 2002 .

[16]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Particle deposition indoors: a review , 2002 .

[17]  Charles J. Weschler,et al.  The significance of secondary organic aerosol formation and growth in buildings: experimental and computational evidence , 2003 .