GENERAL AND SUPERVISION-SPECIFIC ATTACHMENT STYLES: RELATIONS TO STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF FIELD SUPERVISORS

This study extends research on the field supervisory relationship by examining general attachment style and supervision-specific attachment style in a sample of 72 master's-level social work students. Attachment variables were investigated in relation to student perceptions of the supervisory working alliance and supervisory style. Students with higher levels of general attachment avoidance were more likely to develop insecure attachment-related responses to their supervisor. General attachment was mostly unrelated to supervisory alliance and supervisory style variables. Supervision-specific attachment strongly predicted the supervisory alliance and supervisory style, regardless of students' general attachment styles.

[1]  C. Towle,et al.  The learner in education for the professions , 1954 .

[2]  C. Nye.  Using Developmental Processes in Supervision , 2003 .

[3]  A. Kadushin.  What's Wrong, What's Right with Social Work Supervision , 1992 .

[4]  M. Friedlander,et al.  A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. , 2001 .

[5]  W. Bylsma,et al.  General Versus Specific Mental Models of Attachment: Are They Associated with Different Outcomes? , 2000 .

[6]  C. Saari.  The Process of Learning in Clinical Social Work , 1989 .

[7]  John Bowlby,et al.  A Secure Base , 1988 .

[8]  C. S. Bennett,et al.  Attachment-informed Supervision for Social Work Field Education , 2008 .

[9]  C. Munson.  Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision , 1993 .

[10]  G. Creasey,et al.  Generalized and Specific Attachment Representations: Unique and Interactive Roles in Predicting Conflict Behaviors in Close Relationships , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  K. H. Deal,et al.  Beginnings and Endings in Social Work Supervision: The Interaction Between Attachment and Developmental Processes , 2009 .

[12]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[13]  J. Weller,et al.  Organization and Predictive Power of General and Relationship-Specific Attachment Models: One for All, and All for One? , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  E. Bordin.  A Working Alliance Based Model of Supervision , 1983 .

[15]  R. Chris Fraley,et al.  Attachment Stability From Infancy to Adulthood: Meta-Analysis and Dynamic Modeling of Developmental Mechanisms , 2002 .

[16]  M. Pistole,et al.  Attachment Theory, Counseling Process, and Supervision , 1995 .

[17]  A. Bahrick.  Role induction for counselor trainees : effects on the supervisory working alliance / , 1989 .

[18]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  Rhonda Neswald-McCalip.  Development of the Secure Counselor: Case Examples Supporting Pistole & Watkins's (1995) Discussion of Attachment Theory in Counseling Supervision , 2001 .

[20]  M. Bogo,et al.  Educating Field Instructors and Students to Deal with Challenges in Their Teaching Relationships , 2003 .

[21]  T. Tracey,et al.  Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. , 1989 .

[22]  M. Friedlander,et al.  Development and Validation of the Supervisory Styles Inventory. , 1984 .

[23]  J. Bowlby.  Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[24]  Victoria E. White,et al.  Supervisor and Supervisee Attachments and Social Provisions Related to the Supervisory Working Alliance , 2003 .

[25]  L. A. Kurdek,et al.  On Being Insecure about the Assessment of Attachment Styles , 2002 .

[26]  J. Abramson,et al.  Predictors of Satisfaction with Field Practicum Among Social Work Students , 1993 .

[27]  Nicholas Ladany,et al.  The Content and Frequency of Supervisor Self‐Disclosures and Their Relationship to Supervisor Style and the Supervisory Working Alliance , 1999 .

[28]  J. Lydon,et al.  Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Karen Bretz,et al.  Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. , 2006 .

[30]  R. Chris Fraley,et al.  Adult Romantic Attachment: Theoretical Developments, Emerging Controversies, and Unanswered Questions , 2000 .

[31]  C. E. Watkins.  Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision. , 1995 .

[32]  J. Abramson,et al.  Student Learning Processes in Field Education , 2001 .

[33]  L. Saks,et al.  FIELD NOTES: A CONCEPTUAL APPLICATION OF ATTACHMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH TO THE SOCIAL WORK STUDENT-FIELD INSTRUCTOR SUPERVISORY RELATIONSHIP , 2006 .

[34]  M. Ainsworth.  Attachments beyond infancy. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[35]  C. Knight.  The Process of Field Instruction , 2001 .