Definition of a Model for Measuring the Effectiveness of Information Technology Governance: a Study of the Moderator Effect of Organizational Culture Variables

This study began in 2013 through investigation of previous Information Technology Governance (ITG) relationships, in which theoretical evidence was identified to support the perception that the effectiveness of ITG is a result of the alignment between the principles, objectives and mechanisms of ITG. From its partial results, it is possible to highlight the definition of a conceptual model proposed by a Focus Group, in which this Group identified the perspective of IT Governance effectiveness as the one used. The aim of this research is to confirm the relationships between these constructs and to identify the existence of moderation of these relationships through the dimensions of organizational culture. The study is a descriptive exploratory research by nature involving different methodological strategies, working mainly with structural equation modelling.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[2]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Journal of Management on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association Journal and Article Identification Content Review Cultural Values Used Topics Studied Type I Studies—culture as Independent Variable Figure 1 Two Types of Cross-national, Cross-cultural Studies on Individuals and Teams in Organizati , 2022 .

[3]  Lazar Rusu,et al.  The effect of critical success factors on IT governance performance , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Heiner Evanschitzky,et al.  Success Factors of Product Innovation: An Updated Meta‐Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Uwe Flick,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[6]  L. Diamond IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[7]  D. Ketchen A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .

[8]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Control and governance maturity survey: establishing a reference benchmark and a self assessment tool , 2002 .

[9]  Leslie H. Vincent,et al.  Does Innovation Mediate Firm Performance?: A Meta-Analysis of Determinants and Consequences of Organizational Innovation , 2004 .

[10]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[11]  Peter Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[12]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[13]  Matthias Goeken,et al.  IT strategy Implementation Framework - Bridging Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance , 2010, AMCIS.

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[15]  H. Ernst Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2002 .

[16]  Meeta Dasgupta,et al.  Linking Technological Innovation, Technology Strategy and Organizational Factors , 2011 .

[17]  Harry Commandeur,et al.  Understanding new product project performance , 2006 .

[18]  Matthias Goeken,et al.  The Impact of IT Resources on the IT Business Value: Evidence From a Systematic Literature Review , 2011, Int. J. IT Bus. Alignment Gov..

[19]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[20]  Cliff Bowman,et al.  Making the strategy operational , 1987 .

[21]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[22]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[23]  R. Heck,et al.  Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model , 1993 .

[24]  Maurício Gregianin Testa,et al.  An indicators-Based Approach to Measuring Information Technology Governance Effectiveness: a Study with Brazilian Professionals , 2014, ECIS.

[25]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The significance of context in information systems and organizational change , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Measuring New Product Portfolio Innovativeness: How Differences in Scale Width and Evaluator Perspectives Affect its Relationship with Performance , 2013 .

[27]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[28]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[29]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology , 2019, Management for Professionals.

[30]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  The consideration of cultural differences in the design of information systems , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Baldwin S. Hui,et al.  THE PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES APPROACH TO PATH MODELS OF INDIRECTLY OBSERVED VARIABLES WITH MULTIPLE INDICATORS. , 1978 .