Assessing the role of U.S. timberland assets in a mixed portfolio under the mean-conditional value at risk framework

This study examines the role of U.S. timberland assets in a mixed portfolio from the risk perspective. Under the mean-conditional value at risk (M-CVaR) optimization framework, the efficient frontier of the mixed portfolio is dramatically improved after adding timberland assets in comparison of the mean-variance (M-V) efficient frontier. The asset allocation strategies formulated by the static and dynamic optimizations indicate that timberland assets maintain a significant allocation in the mixed portfolio. Moreover, risk decomposition is used to identify the risk sources under four different scenarios. It is found that large-cap stocks and small-cap stocks are generally risk intensifiers, whereas treasury bonds, treasury bills, and timberland assets are risk diversifiers.

[1]  G. Newell,et al.  The role of U.S. timberland in real estate portfolios , 2009 .

[2]  J. Caulfield.  A Fund-Based Timberland Investment Performance Measure and Implications for Asset Allocation , 1998 .

[3]  Neil D. Pearson.  Risk Budgeting: Portfolio Problem Solving with Value-at-Risk , 2002 .

[4]  William G. Hardin,et al.  Farmland in a Mixed-Asset Portfolio: A Mean-Semivariance Approach , 2005 .

[5]  Ioannis D. Vrontos,et al.  Hedge fund portfolio construction: A comparison of static and dynamic approaches , 2007 .

[6]  T. Ebner,et al.  Timberland Investments: A Portfolio Perspective , 1992 .

[7]  R. Fisher,et al.  148: Moments and Cumulants in the Specification of Distributions. , 1938 .

[8]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  Investment decisions under uncertainty—A methodological review on forest science studies , 2011 .

[9]  Clark S. Binkley,et al.  Do Forest Assets Hedge Inflation , 1993 .

[10]  Don T. Johnson,et al.  An analysis of the impact of timberland, farmland and commercial real estate in the asset allocation decisions of institutional investors , 2009 .

[11]  D. Hunter.  Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints , 2002 .

[12]  Hongtao Qiao,et al.  Non-Normality of Market Returns: A Framework for Asset Allocation Decision Making , 2009, The Journal of Alternative Investments.

[13]  T. Thomson.  Long-Term Portfolio Returns from Timber and Financial Assets , 1997 .

[14]  Christophe Croux,et al.  Estimation and Decomposition of Downside Risk for Portfolios with Non-Normal Returns , 2007 .

[15]  V. Agarwal,et al.  Risks and Portfolio Decisions Involving Hedge Funds , 2004 .

[16]  J. Hull.  Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[17]  U. Cherubini,et al.  RiskMetrics Technical Document , 2015 .

[18]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[19]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[20]  M. Clutter,et al.  Risk and required return assessments of equity timberland investments in the United States , 2008 .

[21]  Laurent Favre,et al.  Mean-Modified Value-at-Risk Optimization with Hedge Funds , 2002 .

[22]  M. Clutter,et al.  Assessing the Inflation Hedging Ability of Timberland Assets in the United States , 2013 .

[23]  M. Clutter,et al.  Evaluating the Financial Performance of Timberland Investments in the United States , 2010, Forest Science.

[24]  Bert Scholtens,et al.  Does Money Grow on Trees?: The Diversification Properties of U.S. Timberland Investments , 2009 .

[25]  W. L. Mills,et al.  Investment in Forest Land: Aspects of Risk and Diversification , 1982 .