Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding

Abstract This paper argues for the value of developing an integrated, trans-disciplinary science of human–energy interactions and suggests that Energy Research & Social Science can provide a space for further development of this science. It sketches this intellectual domain and then focuses on that part of it that encompasses interactions of individuals and households with energy systems. It considers the roles of these actors as energy consumers, as citizens who may influence the development and regulation of energy systems, as energy producers, as participants in organizations and institutions, and as parties affected by energy systems. The paper shows, in each case, that single disciplines rarely provide the depth of knowledge that is desirable for understanding or influencing individual and household interactions with energy systems and that integration of knowledge and insights from multiple disciplines is required. It also suggests some promising research directions.

[1]  Richard Heede,et al.  Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010 , 2013, Climatic Change.

[2]  Gareth Shaw,et al.  Sustainable Lifestyles: Sites, Practices, and Policy , 2011 .

[3]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Time to try carbon labelling , 2011 .

[4]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  GENERIC LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT SOCIETAL RESPONSES TO EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES PERCEIVED AS INVOLVING RISKS , 2009 .

[5]  P. Stern.  What psychology knows about energy conservation. , 1992 .

[6]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[7]  Edward J. Walsh,et al.  RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND CITIZEN PROTEST IN COMMUNITIES AROUND THREE MILE ISLAND , 1981 .

[8]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Rethinking embodied knowledge and household consumption , 2014 .

[9]  Michael D Watkins,et al.  Predictable surprises: the disasters you should have seen coming. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[10]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Wolfgang Rudig,et al.  Anti-Nuclear Movements: A World Survey of Opposition to Nuclear Energy , 1990 .

[12]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  R. Sidortsov.  Reinventing rules for environmental risk governance in the energy sector , 2014 .

[14]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[16]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Social Stratification and Environmental Degradation: Understanding Household CO2 Production , 1993 .

[17]  E. Weber,et al.  Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States Scientific Understanding of Climate Change These Assess- Ments Support the following Conclusions with High Or , 2011 .

[18]  Herbert Kitschelt,et al.  Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies , 1986, British Journal of Political Science.

[19]  Robert Gramling,et al.  Community Impacts of Technological Change: Toward a Longitudinal Perspective , 1992 .

[20]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Implementing the Behavioral Wedge: Designing and Adopting Effective Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs , 2010 .

[21]  Brandon H. Lee,et al.  Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector , 2009 .

[22]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[23]  P. Stern.  Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies , 2011 .

[24]  W. Freudenburg.  BOOMTOWN'S YOUTH: THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACTS OF RAPID COMMUNITY GROWTH ON ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS* , 1984 .

[25]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[26]  P. Stern,et al.  Psychological research for the new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. , 1992 .

[27]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Disclosing situational constraints to ecological behavior : a confirmatory application of the mixed Rasch model , 2001 .

[28]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use , 1986 .

[29]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation , 1986 .

[30]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[31]  N. Oreskes,et al.  Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming , 2010 .

[32]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Gifford.  Environmental psychology matters. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  THE POLLS—POLL TRENDS: NUCLEAR POWER: THREE DECADES OF PUBLIC OPINION , 1994 .

[35]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR , 1998 .

[36]  P. Stern,et al.  A second environmental science: human-environment interactions. , 1993, Science.

[37]  Mark A. Cohen,et al.  Carbon Triage: A Strategy for Developing a Viable Carbon Labeling System , 2013 .

[38]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[39]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use , 2014 .

[41]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory , 2005 .

[42]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain , 2008 .

[43]  Serge Desmarais,et al.  Determinants of Responsible Environmental Behavior , 1995 .

[44]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust , 2014 .

[45]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Individual-motivational factors in the acceptability of demand-side and supply-side measures to reduce carbon emissions , 2012 .

[46]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[47]  James E. McMahon,et al.  The Behavior of the Market for Energy Efficiency in Residential Appliances Including Heating and Cooling Equipment , 1987 .

[48]  C. Vlek,et al.  Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[49]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Folk quantification of energy , 1982 .