A Kuhnian Analysis of Revolutionary Digital Disruptions

Disruption has become a term of fashion. While overused, disruption refers to an important phenomenon; how certain new technologies bring about profound changes to markets and society, thereby devaluing established business practices. Since the dominant theory, Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation, focuses only on one narrow aspect of the disruption phenomenon, alternative approaches are needed to theorise how digital technologies bring about revolutionary changes to industries and society more broadly. We propose to consider disruption akin to a Kuhnian revolution. By drawing direct parallels between paradigmatic shifts in scientific fields and technology-induced industry disruptions, we come to understand disruption as a shift in understanding that fundamentally alters what counts as customer value or product quality and as a result puts the industry on a new trajectory. We draw on the music industry to illustrate our line of argument.

[1]  J. West,et al.  Disruptive Innovation , 2015 .

[2]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[3]  Davide Nicolini.  Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction , 2013 .

[4]  G. Milner.  Perfecting Sound Forever: An Aural History of Recorded Music , 2009 .

[5]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[6]  G. Tellis.  Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership? , 2006 .

[7]  Michael C. Wendl,et al.  Argonaute—a database for gene regulation by mammalian microRNAs , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Erwin Danneels.  Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[9]  George Westerman,et al.  Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability , 2002 .

[10]  Ron Adner.  When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[11]  T. Schatzki.  The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change , 2002 .

[12]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[13]  A. Pickering.  Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics , 1985 .

[14]  D. Eckberg,et al.  The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[15]  C. Bryant.  Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology , 1975 .

[16]  John Urry,et al.  Thomas S. Kuhn as Sociologist of Knowledge , 1973 .

[17]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[18]  David Philp,et al.  How Music Got Free: The End of an Industry, the Turn of the Century, and the Patient Zero of Piracy , 2015 .

[19]  Clayton M. Christensen.  How Useful Is the Theory of Disruptive Innovation ? , 2015 .

[20]  Jill Lepore,et al.  The Disruption Machine: What the gospel of innovation gets wrong , 2014 .

[21]  A. Cummings.  Democracy of Sound: Music Piracy and the Remaking of American Copyright in the Twentieth Century , 2013 .

[22]  Abayomi Baiyere,et al.  Review: Disruptive Innovation & Information Technology - Charting a path , 2013, ACIS.

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[24]  Rebecca Henderson.  The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence , 2006 .

[25]  C. Markides.  Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[26]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas S. Mosley,et al.  Thomas S , 2005 .

[28]  G. Postiglione.  The Nature as Paradigm , 2002 .

[29]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[30]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[31]  T. Kuhn.  Second thoughts on paradigms , 1977 .

[32]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .