On the influence of social factors on team recommendations

In the last 10 years a new paradigm for creating innovations by also using external sources and paths to market has emerged and became popular. This paradigm is known as open innovation. Through the possible inclusion of these external sources for the innovation process a larger number of people (and thereby knowledge and skills) are available. People and organizations are connected in a network (so called open innovation network) of collaboration. These networks are valuable and provide an important source for composing teams, working on specific open innovation projects inside an open innovation community. We address the problem of composing such a team given the complexity of the network and innovation tasks with algorithmic team recommendation. Thereby different challenges have to be regarded such as including different aspects of team composition that were subject of research in the social and psychological sciences. We base this article on our previous work on the categorization of influencing team compostion aspects and create a team composition model based uniquely on social aspects as an example for mapping classical team composition models onto our categorization. Furthermore, we describe typical issues arising when creating team composition models from scratch when mapping them onto our proposed meta model that represents the main component of our recommender approach.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[2]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[4]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Knowledge based approach to semantic composition of teams in an organization , 2005, SAC '05.

[5]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[6]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[7]  C. Stevens,et al.  Goal congruence in project teams: does the fit between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter? , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[10]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[11]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[12]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust , 2000 .

[13]  Jonathan Trower,et al.  A study of the impact of individual goals and team composition variables on team performance , 1996, Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference.

[14]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[15]  E. S. Conklin Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[16]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[17]  Georg Groh,et al.  Team recommendation in open innovation networks , 2009, RecSys '09.

[18]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[19]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[20]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[21]  Hugo M. Kehr,et al.  MACQUARIE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT MGSM WORKING PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT INTEGRATING IMPLICIT MOTIVES, EXPLICIT MOTIVES, AND PERCEIVED ABILITIES: THE COMPENSATORY MODEL OF WORK MOTIVATION AND VOLITION , 2005 .