Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system

We have been developing the Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system using magnetic position tracker to quantitate knee laxity diagnosis. In this study, to investigate the influence of anatomical landmark sampling error for bone coordinate registration, reproducibility verification simulation was done. Firstly, the motion data of imitation bones was acquired using the system and set as a reference data. To get the error motion data, virtual error vectors were added on the reference sampling points and new motion data was recomputed. Evaluation was executed by comparison with the reference data and recomputed data. The evaluation results lead improvement methods of measurement reproducibility as follows. 1. It is important to point the landmarks proximal to the knee carefully because the contribution of the motion error is higher than the distal landmarks. 2. To reduce the registration error, thigh and shank receivers should be set close to the knee as possible. 3. If the allowance area of the sampling error is in 2.0 mm diameter circle, Diagnosis error using IKDC Knee examination form is approximately 20 %.

[1]  D Testi,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of image-free navigation system for total knee arthroplasty , 2011, Musculoskeletal surgery.

[2]  Joseph J. Cipriano Photographic Manual of Regional Orthopaedic and Neurological Tests , 1991 .

[3]  W. Müller,et al.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  P. Neyret,et al.  The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Knee.

[5]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jun Okamoto,et al.  Orthopaedic Physical Examination Assisting System for Improvement of Accuracy and Reproducibility of Knee Laxity Diagnosis , 2011 .

[8]  Yaron S Brin,et al.  Precise landmarking in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty is critical to final alignment , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Hiroki Wakabayashi,et al.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  Kouki Nagamune,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of the Pivot-Shift Test in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee Using an Electromagnetic Device , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  G. Hofmann,et al.  Fluoro-Free navigated retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.