Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity

Our understanding of the biologic effects (including toxicity) of nanomaterials is incomplete. In vivo animal studies remain the gold standard; however, widespread testing remains impractical, and the development of in vitro assays that correlate with in vivo activity has proven challenging. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of analyzing in vitro nanomaterial activity in a generalizable, systematic fashion. We assessed nanoparticle effects in a multidimensional manner, using multiple cell types and multiple assays that reflect different aspects of cellular physiology. Hierarchical clustering of these data identifies nanomaterials with similar patterns of biologic activity across a broad sampling of cellular contexts, as opposed to extrapolating from results of a single in vitro assay. We show that this approach yields robust and detailed structure–activity relationships. Furthermore, a subset of nanoparticles were tested in mice, and nanoparticles with similar activity profiles in vitro exert similar effects on monocyte number in vivo. These data suggest a strategy of multidimensional characterization of nanomaterials in vitro that can inform the design of novel nanomaterials and guide studies of in vivo activity.

[1]  Scott E McNeil,et al.  Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  P. Libby,et al.  The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  Navid B. Saleh,et al.  Nanosize Titanium Dioxide Stimulates Reactive Oxygen Species in Brain Microglia and Damages Neurons in Vitro , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  M. Dobrovolskaia,et al.  Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials , 2007, Nature Nanotechnology.

[5]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  Simultaneous multicolor imaging of five different lymphatic basins using quantum dots. , 2007, Nano letters.

[6]  H. Byrne,et al.  In vitro toxicity evaluation of single walled carbon nanotubes on human A549 lung cells. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[7]  Sung Ju Cho,et al.  Quantum dot-induced cell death involves Fas upregulation and lipid peroxidation in human neuroblastoma cells , 2007, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[8]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Emerging concepts in molecular MRI. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  P. Libby,et al.  Ly-6Chi monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata. , 2007, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[11]  J. Mesirov,et al.  GenePattern 2.0 , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[12]  H. Krug,et al.  Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. , 2006, Nano letters.

[13]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Labeling of immune cells for in vivo imaging using magnetofluorescent nanoparticles , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[14]  M. Howarth,et al.  Targeting quantum dots to surface proteins in living cells with biotin ligase. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Quantum Dots for Live Cells, in Vivo Imaging, and Diagnostics , 2005, Science.

[16]  Eberhard Durr,et al.  Direct proteomic mapping of the lung microvascular endothelial cell surface in vivo and in cell culture , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Capacity of human monocytes to phagocytose approved iron oxide MR contrast agents in vitro , 2004, European Radiology.

[18]  J. James,et al.  Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[19]  T. Webb,et al.  Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[20]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  Consensus Clustering: A Resampling-Based Method for Class Discovery and Visualization of Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2003, Machine Learning.

[21]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Crosslinked iron oxides (CLIO): a new platform for the development of targeted MR contrast agents. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[23]  D. Botstein,et al.  A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Jae K. Lee,et al.  Mining and Visualizing Large Anticancer Drug Discovery Databases , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.

[26]  A. Fournier,et al.  Effects of the ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, bosentan on endothelin‐1‐induced myocardial ischaemia and oedema in the rat , 1995, British journal of pharmacology.

[27]  S E Seltzer,et al.  Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: a multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[28]  R Weissleder,et al.  Monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds (MION): Physicochemical properties , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  R Weissleder,et al.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide: pharmacokinetics and toxicity. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  A. Thomson,et al.  Immunosuppressive activity, lymphocyte subset analysis, and acute toxicity of FK-506 in the rat. A comparative and combination study with cyclosporine. , 1989, Transplantation.