Propagation of electric activity in motor nerve terminals

External micro-electrodes were used to stimulate non-myelinated motor nerve terminals and to record pre- and post-synaptic responses at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. The synaptic terminals of the motor axon are electrically excitable. Antidromic nerve impulses can be set up by local stimulation of terminals along the greater part of their length. Presynaptic spikes can be recorded from the non-myelinated terminal parts of motor axons. As the impulse proceeds towards the tip of the terminal branch, the shape of the spike changes from a predominantly negative to a predominantly positive-going wave. Similar changes occur in muscle fibres near their tendon junctions, and can be attributed to the special local-circuit conditions at the ‘closed end’ of a fibre. The velocity of impulse propagation in motor nerve endings was determined by three different methods: (a) from the latency of antidromic nerve spikes elicited at different points along terminals, (b) from two-point recording of spikes along a terminal, (c) from the differential latency of focal end-plate potentials recorded at two spots of a myoneural junction. The average velocity obtained by these methods was approximately 0.3 m/s at 20 °C. Extracellular muscle fibre spikes recorded at junctional spots showed no significant differences from those recorded elsewhere, provided the spikes were initiated by direct stimulation and did not coincide with transmitter action. Direct current polarization produces a graded increase in frequency of miniature end-plate potentials when the endings are being depolarized, and sudden high-frequency bursts during excessive hyperpolarization. External two-point recording shows that these bursts arise independently at different spots of the synaptic terminals.

[1]  A TAKEUCHI,et al.  Active phase of frog's end-plate potential. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  B. Katz,et al.  The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibres , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  B. Katz,et al.  The Electrical Properties of the Muscle Fibre Membrane , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[4]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  Electric interaction between two adjacent nerve fibres , 1940, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. Schmidt,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of mammalian motor nerve terminals , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Katz,et al.  Localization of active spots within the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Electrical investigation of the monosynaptic pathway through the spinal cord. , 1947, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. Dettbarn Effect of Curare on Conduction in Myelinated, Isolated Nerve Fibres of the Frog , 1960, Nature.

[9]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Analysis of afferent and efferent systems in the muscle nerve of the toad and cat , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  H. Fromherz The action of veratrine, curare and strychnine on the response of medullated nerve , 1933, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  B. Katz,et al.  The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  B. Katz,et al.  The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  B. Katz Action potentials from a sensory nerve ending , 1950, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  S. Ehrenpreis,et al.  Reversible block of axonal conduction by curare after treatment with cobra venom. , 1961, Biochemical pharmacology.

[15]  B. Katz,et al.  The membrane change produced by the neuromuscular transmitter , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  B. Katz,et al.  Changes in end‐plate activity produced by pre‐synaptic polarization , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  A. Takeuchi,et al.  Further analysis of relationship between end-plate potential and end-plate current. , 1960, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Stampflj,et al.  Reversible electrical breakdown of the excitable membrane of a Ranvier node , 1958 .

[19]  B. Katz,et al.  The effect of calcium on acetylcholine release from motor nerve terminals , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  B. Katz,et al.  On the localization of acetylcholine receptors , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  R. Werman Electrical Inexcitability of the Frog Neuromuscular Synapse , 1963, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  R. L. Nó,et al.  DECREMENTAL CONDUCTION IN PERIPHERAL NERVE. INTEGRATION OF STIMULI IN THE NEURON. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G B KOELLE,et al.  A Histochemical Method for Localizing Cholinesterase Activity.* , 1949, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[24]  R. Couteaux Remarques sur les Méthodes Agtuelles de Détection Histochimique des Activités Cholinestérasiques , 1951 .

[25]  B. Katz,et al.  An analysis of the end‐plate potential recorded with an intra‐cellular electrode , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  J. D. Del Castillo,et al.  The effect of calcium ions on the motor end‐plate potentials , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  G. Falk,et al.  Linear electrical properties of striated muscle fibres observed with intracellular electrodes , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[28]  A. W. Liley,et al.  The effects of presynaptic polarization on the spontaneous activity at the mammalian neuromuscular junction , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  W. Rall Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. , 1962, Biophysical journal.

[30]  J. D. Del Castillo,et al.  The nature of the neuromuscular block produced by magnesium , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J. Y. Lettvin,et al.  Comments on Microelectrodes , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[32]  F. Ito,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION BETWEEN THE EXTRAFUSAL RECEPTOR AND THE SPINDLE RECEPTOR IN THE FROG. , 1964, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[33]  O. Hutter,et al.  Nature of neuromuscular facilitation by sympathetic stimulation in the frog , 1955, The Journal of physiology.