Mechanical design of mussel byssus: material yield enhances attachment strength

The competitive dominance of mussels in the wave-swept rocky intertidal zone is in part due to their ability to maintain a secure attachment. Mussels are tethered to the substratum by a byssus composed of numerous extracellular, collagenous threads secreted by the foot. Each byssal thread has three serially arranged parts: a corrugated proximal region, a smooth distal region and an adhesive plaque. This study examines the material and structural properties of the byssal threads of three mussel species: Mytilus californianus, M. trossulus, and M. galloprovincialis. Tensile tests in general reveal similar material properties among species: the proximal region has a lower initial modulus, a lower ultimate stress and a higher ultimate strain than the distal region. The distal region also yields at a stress well below its ultimate value. In whole thread tests, the proximal region and adhesive plaque are common sites of structural failure and are closely matched in strength, while the distal region appears to be excessively strong. We propose that the high strength of the distal region is the byproduct of a material designed to yield and extend before structural failure occurs. Experimental and theoretical evidence is presented suggesting that thread yield and extensibility provide two important mechanisms for increasing the overall attachment strength of the mussel: (1) the reorientation of threads towards the direction of applied load, and (2) the 'recruitment' of more threads into tension and the consequent distribution of applied load over a larger cross-sectional area, thereby reducing the stress on each thread. This distal region yield behavior is most striking for M. californianus and may be a key to its success in extreme wave-swept environments.

[1]  A. Bairati,et al.  The ultrastructure of the byssal apparatus of Mytilus galloprovincialis , 1976, Cell and Tissue Research.

[2]  J. Harger.  COMPETITIVE COEXISTENCE MAINTENANCE OF INTERACTING ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SEA MUSSELS MYTILUS-EDULIS AND MYTILUS-CALIFORNIANUS , 1972 .

[3]  S. A. Wainwright,et al.  Mechanical Design in Organisms , 2020 .

[4]  H. Price.  An Analysis of Factors Determining Seasonal Variation in the Byssal Attachment Strength of Mytilus Edulis , 1982, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[5]  R. K. Koehn,et al.  The musselsMytilus galloprovincialis andM. trossulus on the Pacific coast of North America , 1988 .

[6]  J. Waite,et al.  The formation of mussel byssus: anatomy of a natural manufacturing process. , 1992, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[7]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Wave forces on intertidal organisms: A case study1 , 1985 .

[8]  T. Suchanek,et al.  Mussels in flow: drag and dislodgement by epizoans , 1984 .

[9]  C. H. Brown.  Some Structural Proteins of Mytilus edulis , 1952 .

[10]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Lift as a mechanism of patch initiation in mussel beds , 1987 .

[11]  H. H. Ryffel.  Machinery's Handbook , 1984 .

[12]  Samuel H. Preston,et al.  Observations on the rate of production and mechanical properties of the byssus threads of Mytilus ed , 1976 .

[13]  Shirley S. L. Lim,et al.  The rate and strength of byssal reattachment by blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) , 1990 .

[14]  M W Denny.  Silks--their properties and functions. , 1980, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[15]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Population and community ecol-ogy of Mytilus , 1992 .

[16]  J. Waite,et al.  Protein gradients in byssal threads of some marine bivalve molluscs. , 1986, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[17]  B. Menge,et al.  Biology and the mechanics of the wave-swept environment (M. W. Denny) , 1990 .

[18]  X. Qin,et al.  Exotic collagen gradients in the byssus of the mussel Mytilus edulis. , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[20]  H. Price.  Seasonal variation in the strength of byssal attachment of the common mussel Mytilus edulis L. , 1980, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[21]  L. Vitellaro‐Zuccarello,et al.  The ultrastructure of the byssal apparatus of a mussel. V. Localization of collagenic and elastic components in the threads. , 1983, Tissue & cell.

[22]  J. Gardner,et al.  Biological and physical factors influencing genotype-dependent mortality in hybrid mussel populations , 1991 .

[23]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Mechanical Consequences of Size in Wave‐Swept Algae , 1994 .

[24]  J. Waite,et al.  ADHESION IN BYSSALLY ATTACHED BIVALVES , 1983 .

[25]  James E. Smeathers,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MUSSEL BYSSUS THREADS , 1979 .

[26]  E. C. Bell,et al.  Quantifying «wave exposure»: a simple device for recording maximum velocity and results of its use at several field sites , 1994 .

[27]  B. Bayne,et al.  Seasonal variation in the relative utilization of carbon and nitrogen by the mussel Mytilus edulis: budgets, conversion efficiencies and maintenance requirements , 1985 .

[28]  The ultrastructure of the byssal apparatus of Mytilus galloprovincialis. II. Observations by microdissection and scanning electron microscopy , 1974 .

[29]  J. Harger.  THE EFFECT OF WAVE IMPACT ON SOME ASPECTS OF THE BIOLOGY OF SEA MUSSELS , 1970 .

[30]  I. Svane,et al.  Attachment and orientation of Mytilus Edulis L. in flowing water , 1994 .

[31]  David L. Butler,et al.  Mechanical design in organisms , 1986 .

[32]  D. Skibinski,et al.  Variation in strength of attachment to the substrate explains differential mortality in hybrid mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. edulis) populations , 1992 .