Measurement of flaw size from thermographic data

Simple methods for reducing the pulsed thermographic responses of delaminations tend to overestimate the size of the delamination, since the heat diffuses in the plane parallel to the surface. The result is a temperature profile over the delamination which is larger than the delamination size. A variational approach is presented for reducing the thermographic data to produce an estimated size for a flaw that is much closer to the true size of the delamination. The method is based on an estimate for the thermal response that is a convolution of a Gaussian kernel with the shape of the flaw. The size is determined from both the temporal and spatial thermal response of the exterior surface above the delamination and constraints on the length of the contour surrounding the delamination. Examples of the application of the technique to simulation and experimental data are presented to investigate the limitations of the technique.

[1]  L. Vese,et al.  A Variational Method in Image Recovery , 1997 .

[2]  Darryl P Almond,et al.  Quantitative determination of impact damage and other defects in carbon fiber composities by transient thermography , 1996, Smart Structures.

[3]  D. Almond,et al.  Transient thermography in the assessment of defects of aircraft composites , 2003 .

[4]  Pierre Kornprobst,et al.  Mathematical problems in image processing - partial differential equations and the calculus of variations , 2010, Applied mathematical sciences.

[5]  Darryl P Almond,et al.  Defect sizing by transient thermography. I. An analytical treatment , 1994 .

[6]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Nondestructive Testing , 2001 .

[7]  X. Maldague,et al.  Aircraft composites assessment by means of transient thermal NDT , 2004 .

[8]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[9]  Lawrence D. Favro,et al.  Inverse scattering algorithm applied to infrared thermal wave images , 1993 .

[10]  Bruce A. Rubadeux,et al.  Reconstruction and enhancement of active thermographic image sequences , 2003 .

[11]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Doekele G. Stavenga,et al.  ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF MATERIALS , 1994 .

[13]  Xavier Maldague.  Advances in signal processing for non destructive evaluation of materials , 2004, Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[14]  Y. A. Plotnikov,et al.  Temporal Treatment of a Thermal Response for Defect Depth Estimation , 2000 .

[16]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Non-destructive testing of structural composites and adhesively bonded composite joints: pulsed thermography , 2002 .

[17]  William P. Winfree,et al.  Improved sizing of impact damage in composites based on thermographic response , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[18]  William P. Winfree,et al.  Thermographic determination of delamination depth in composites , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  Denis Maillet,et al.  Non-destructive thermal evaluation of delaminations in a laminate: Part I—Identification by measurement of thermal contrast , 1993 .

[20]  Declan G. Bates,et al.  Rapid thermal non-destructive testing of aircraft components , 2000 .