Managing Innovation: A Multidisciplinary Scenario Development Approach

The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) is focusing on and shifting toward a Network Enabled Capability (NEC) approach for improved military effect. This is being realised through the physical networking and coherent integration of existing and future resources including sensors, effectors, support services, and decision makers. This paper is a case study (for NEC) of how the development and use of scenarios for demonstrating academic research can aid and help manage innovation. It illustrates the development, use and application of a multiple stakeholder scenario within the NECTISE research programme that helped establish and exploit a collaborative multidisciplinary working environment and how it helped manage innovative academic research. Our experience suggests that this approach can support the engagement of multiple stakeholders with differing perceptions and priorities and will provide a scenario development strategy for improved research and innovation for many other large systems.

[1]  Kamal Munir,et al.  Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation , 2000 .

[2]  Jamie D. Collins,et al.  Beyond Risk Mitigation: Enhancing Corporate Innovation with Scenario Planning , 2009 .

[3]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[4]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  Risk management through learning: Management practices for radical innovation success , 2008 .

[5]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Scenarios of technology and innovation policies in Europe: Investigating future governance , 2003 .

[6]  Petteri Piippo,et al.  An analysis of innovation management systems' characteristics , 1999 .

[7]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[8]  J. Tidd,et al.  Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[9]  Jie Xu,et al.  Service-Oriented Integration of Systems for Military Capability , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[10]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Five reasons for scenario-based design , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios , 2001 .

[12]  Scott Berkun,et al.  The myths of innovation , 2007 .

[13]  Jie Xu,et al.  Evolutionary service-oriented architecture for network enabled capability , 2008 .

[14]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Information technology support for the knowledge and social processes of innovation management , 2006 .

[15]  Yi Yue,et al.  The Influence of the Concept of Capability-based Management on the Development of the Systems Engineering Discipline , 2009 .

[16]  Rhonda Roberts,et al.  Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments , 1998 .

[17]  Jie Xu,et al.  Agile properties of service oriented architectures for network enabled capability. , 2008 .