Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects ☆

Abstract Although organizational justice has been shown to have behavioral consequences, there remains a surprising amount of variation in how individuals react to fair and unfair treatment. The present study drew on three integrative theories in the justice literature—fairness heuristic theory, uncertainty management theory, and fairness theory—to identify personality traits that could explain such variation. From these theories, we identified trust propensity, risk aversion, and morality (rooted in circumplex models of personality) as potential moderators. A laboratory study provided some support for the prediction that the three traits moderate the effects of procedural, interpersonal, and distributive justice on task performance and counterproductive behavior. The moderating effects of the three traits explained more variance in the outcomes than moderators based in the justice literature (equity sensitivity, sensitivity to befallen injustice) or the five-factor model of personality. Taken together, the results suggest that the three integrative theories can inform the search for personality-based moderators of justice effects.

[1]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[2]  E. Uhlmann,et al.  Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility , 2003 .

[3]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union : A test of organizational justice theory , 1996 .

[4]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  What is organizational justice? A historical overview. , 2005 .

[5]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[6]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  T. Judge,et al.  PAY PREFERENCES AND JOB SEARCH DECISIONS: A PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[8]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Dispositional Affect and Job Satisfaction: A Review and Theoretical Extension , 2001 .

[9]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[10]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Equity and Justice in Social Behavior , 1982 .

[11]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft , 2002 .

[12]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[13]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[14]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[15]  H. Wilke,et al.  When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. , 1998 .

[16]  K. van den Bos,et al.  Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects : On the psychology of the fair process effect , 1999 .

[17]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[18]  Terry M. Coalter,et al.  Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance: Psychometric and Verbal Protocol Evidence , 1996 .

[19]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[20]  W. C. King,et al.  The measurement of equity sensitivity , 1994 .

[21]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. , 1993 .

[22]  R. Tett,et al.  Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation , 2000 .

[23]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[24]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Comparison of Three Models for Predicting Altruistic Behavior. , 1978 .

[26]  B. de Raad,et al.  Towards a refined structure of personality traits , 1992 .

[27]  R. Bies.  Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[28]  R. Neumann,et al.  Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice , 1995 .

[29]  B. Schneider.  Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. , 1982 .

[30]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives , 1996 .

[31]  K. van den Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. , 2002 .

[32]  L. Witt,et al.  The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor‐rated commitment , 2001 .

[33]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[34]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation , 1999 .

[35]  K. Bos.  Fairness heuristic theory : Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice , 2001 .

[36]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: converging evidence from five studies. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[38]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. , 1993 .

[39]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Locus of Control as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Influence and Procedural Justice , 1991 .

[40]  Elizabeth E. Umphress,et al.  Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness , 2002 .

[41]  E. Lind,et al.  When fairness works : Toward a general theory of uncertainty management , 2002 .

[42]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[43]  G. Leventhal.  What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. , 1976 .

[44]  K. Deaux,et al.  Individual Differences in Justice Behavior , 1982 .

[45]  B. Buunk,et al.  Do Just World Believers Process Unfair Authoritative Decisions Differently , 2002 .

[46]  E. Lind.  Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. , 2001 .

[47]  Robert Folger,et al.  Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. , 2001 .

[48]  J. Colquitt,et al.  To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  E. Blumenthal,et al.  A Deservingness Approach to Respect as a Relationally Based Fairness Judgment , 1999 .

[50]  J. Brockner,et al.  The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall , 1992 .

[51]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[52]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity , 2003 .

[53]  Edward W. Miles,et al.  A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct , 1987 .

[54]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice , 2001 .

[55]  L. Witt,et al.  Delay of Gratification as a Moderator of the Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Relationship , 1992 .

[56]  M. Maehr,et al.  Predisposition to risk and persistence under varying reinforcement-success schedules. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  H. Wilke,et al.  Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments , 1998 .

[58]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. , 1999, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[59]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity , 1993 .

[60]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[61]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[62]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts , 1990, Occupational Crime.

[63]  Lawrence J. Walker,et al.  The Model and the Measure: An appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development , 2002 .

[64]  J. Hogan,et al.  Issues and non‐issues in the fidelity–bandwidth trade‐off , 1996 .

[65]  R. Kanfer.  Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[66]  G. Homans,et al.  Social Behaviour, Its Elementary Forms , 1962 .

[67]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[68]  R. Folger,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality , 2005 .

[69]  K. Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. , 2001 .

[70]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. , 1993 .

[71]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Factors Defined by Negatively Keyed Items: The Result of Careless Respondents? , 1985 .

[72]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[73]  Manfred J. Schmitt,et al.  Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well‐being , 1999 .

[74]  L. Kohlberg.  The Psychology Of Moral Development , 1984 .

[75]  R. Bies,et al.  Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. , 1996 .

[76]  J. Colquitt.  On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[77]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .

[78]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .

[79]  Edward W. Miles,et al.  A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct , 1993 .

[80]  R. Folger.  Fairness as Moral Virtue , 1998 .

[81]  D. Ones.  The construct validity of integrity tests. , 1994 .

[82]  Henk A. M. Wilke,et al.  The consistency rule and the voice effect : The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance , 1996 .

[83]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.