Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of Temporal-Spatial, Kinematic, and Dynamic Stability Measures during Perturbed Gait

Temporal-spatial, kinematic variability, and dynamic stability measures collected during perturbation-based assessment paradigms are often used to identify dysfunction associated with gait instability. However, it remains unclear which measures are most reliable for detecting and tracking responses to perturbations. This study systematically determined the between-session reliability and minimum detectable change values of temporal-spatial, kinematic variability, and dynamic stability measures during three types of perturbed gait. Twenty young healthy adults completed two identical testing sessions two weeks apart, comprised of an unperturbed and three perturbed (cognitive, physical, and visual) walking conditions in a virtual reality environment. Within each session, perturbation responses were compared to unperturbed walking using paired t-tests. Between-session reliability and minimum detectable change values were also calculated for each measure and condition. All temporal-spatial, kinematic variability and dynamic stability measures demonstrated fair to excellent between-session reliability. Minimal detectable change values, normalized to mean values ranged from 1–50%. Step width mean and variability measures demonstrated the greatest response to perturbations with excellent between-session reliability and low minimum detectable change values. Orbital stability measures demonstrated specificity to perturbation direction and sensitivity with excellent between-session reliability and low minimum detectable change values. We observed substantially greater between-session reliability and lower minimum detectable change values for local stability measures than previously described which may be the result of averaging across trials within a session and using velocity versus acceleration data for reconstruction of state spaces. Across all perturbation types, temporal-spatial, orbital and local measures were the most reliable measures with the lowest minimum detectable change values, supporting their use for tracking changes over multiple testing sessions. The between-session reliability and minimum detectable change values reported here provide an objective means for interpreting changes in temporal-spatial, kinematic variability, and dynamic stability measures during perturbed walking which may assist in identifying instability.

[1]  Philippe Terrier,et al.  Do orthopaedic shoes improve local dynamic stability of gait? An observational study in patients with chronic foot and ankle injuries , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  W Poewe,et al.  Influence of Concurrent Tasks on Gait: A Dual-Task Approach , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Jason M Wilken,et al.  Application of a mild traumatic brain injury rehabilitation program in a virtual realty environment: a case study. , 2011, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[4]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Young and old adults prioritize dynamic stability control following gait perturbations when performing a concurrent cognitive task. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[5]  Scott A. England,et al.  The influence of gait speed on local dynamic stability of walking. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[6]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Speeding up or slowing down?: Gait adaptations to preserve gait stability in response to balance perturbations. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[7]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[8]  Charles Hall,et al.  Validity of Divided Attention Tasks In Predicting Falls in Older Individuals: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets , 1993 .

[10]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Statistical precision and sensitivity of measures of dynamic gait stability , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Patricia M McAndrew,et al.  Walking Variability during Continuous Pseudo-random Oscillations of the Support Surface and Visual Field , 2022 .

[12]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  John H Hollman,et al.  Number of strides required for reliable measurements of pace, rhythm and variability parameters of gait during normal and dual task walking in older individuals. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[14]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Assessing gait stability: the influence of state space reconstruction on inter- and intra-day reliability of local dynamic stability during over-ground walking. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Dynamic stability of superior vs. inferior body segments in individuals with transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Amplitude effects of medio-lateral mechanical and visual perturbations on gait. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  E. J. Beltran,et al.  Mediolateral angular momentum changes in persons with amputation during perturbed walking. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[19]  J. Doyon,et al.  Modality-specific, multitask locomotor deficits persist despite good recovery after a traumatic brain injury. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Dual-task costs while walking increase in old age for some, but not for other tasks: an experimental study of healthy young and elderly persons , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  Metin Akay,et al.  Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering , 2006 .

[22]  C. J. V. van Uden,et al.  Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite®) , 2004, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[23]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Dynamic stability of individuals with transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Hogene Kim,et al.  Effect of a vocal choice reaction time task on the kinematics of the first recovery step after a sudden underfoot perturbation during gait. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[25]  Philippe Terrier,et al.  Local dynamic stability of treadmill walking: intrasession and week-to-week repeatability. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  S. Studenski,et al.  Use of Motor Abundance in Young and Older Adults during Dual-Task Treadmill Walking , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  A. Kuo,et al.  Energetic cost of walking with increased step variability. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[28]  K. Aminian,et al.  Dual-task-related gait changes in the elderly: does the type of cognitive task matter? , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  Emily Fox,et al.  Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: a dual task study. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[30]  Charles S. Layne,et al.  Does load carrying influence sagittal plane locomotive stability? , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[32]  V. Nougier,et al.  Age-related differences in cognitive and postural dual-task performance. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[33]  M. Morris,et al.  Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[34]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Toward ambulatory balance assessment: estimating variability and stability from short bouts of gait. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[35]  Olivier Daniel,et al.  Human treadmill walking needs attention , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  L. Bouyer,et al.  Visual-vestibular influences on locomotor adjustments for stepping over an obstacle , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  S. Haley,et al.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[38]  Y. Hurmuzlu,et al.  On the measurement of dynamic stability of human locomotion. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  C Basdogan,et al.  Kinematics and dynamic stability of the locomotion of post-polio patients. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  Barbara L. Shay,et al.  The interacting effect of cognitive and motor task demands on performance of gait, balance and cognition in young adults. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[41]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[42]  Gottfried Mayer-Kress,et al.  Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems , 1986 .

[43]  A. Ramnemark,et al.  Changes in step-width during dual-task walking predicts falls. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[44]  Li-Shan Chou,et al.  The effect of divided attention on gait stability following concussion. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[45]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  Thurmon E Lockhart,et al.  Dynamic stability differences in fall-prone and healthy adults. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[47]  Philippe Terrier,et al.  Kinematic variability, fractal dynamics and local dynamic stability of treadmill walking , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[48]  B. Melnyk,et al.  Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice , 2005 .

[49]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. , 2000, Chaos.

[50]  H. Dawes,et al.  Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[51]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Comparison of different state space definitions for local dynamic stability analyses. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  A shoe sole-based apparatus and method for randomly perturbing the stance phase of gait: test-retest reliability in young adults. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Effects of perturbation magnitude on dynamic stability when walking in destabilizing environments. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  Risto Ilmoniemi,et al.  Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering , 2006 .

[55]  J S Higginson,et al.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[56]  E. J. Beltran,et al.  Margins of stability in young adults with traumatic transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[57]  Karen L Troy,et al.  Effects of an attention demanding task on dynamic stability during treadmill walking , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[58]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Dynamic stability of human walking in visually and mechanically destabilizing environments. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  A. Nayfeh,et al.  Applied nonlinear dynamics : analytical, computational, and experimental methods , 1995 .

[61]  Stolze,et al.  Retest reliability of spatiotemporal gait parameters in children and adults. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[62]  Shawn M O'Connor,et al.  Fast visual prediction and slow optimization of preferred walking speed. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  Andrew M. Fraser,et al.  Using Mutual Information to Estimate Metric Entropy , 1986 .

[64]  Jonathan B. Dingwell,et al.  Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking? , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  Richard H. Rand.  Applied Nonlinear Dynamics: Analytical, Computational and Experimental Methods (Ali H. Nayfeh and Balakumar Balachandran) , 1996, SIAM Rev..

[66]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  How Does Explicit Prioritization Alter Walking During Dual-Task Performance? Effects of Age and Sex on Gait Speed and Variability , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[67]  P. Shrout.  Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[68]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Froude and the contribution of naval architecture to our understanding of bipedal locomotion. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[69]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[70]  Olivier Beauchet,et al.  Dual-Task-Related Gait Changes in , 2004, Gerontology.

[71]  C. Lamoth,et al.  Gait stability and variability measures show effects of impaired cognition and dual tasking in frail people , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[72]  S. Finch.  Lyapunov Exponents , 2007 .

[73]  Dario Farina,et al.  Biomechanical strategies to accommodate expected slips in different directions during walking. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[74]  Kim R. Gottshall,et al.  Tracking Recovery of Vestibular Function in Individuals With Blast-Induced Head Trauma Using Vestibular-Visual-Cognitive Interaction Tests , 2010, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[75]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[76]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Challenge on Gait Variability in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2003, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[77]  M. Grabiner,et al.  Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.