Developing data-driven surrogate models for holistic performance-based assessment of mid-rise RC frame buildings at early design
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mehrdad Shokrabadi,et al. A database of seismic designs, nonlinear models, and seismic responses for steel moment-resisting frame buildings , 2020 .
[2] Jack W. Baker,et al. Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .
[3] M. Banazadeh,et al. The effect of design drift limit on the seismic performance of RC dual high‐rise buildings , 2018 .
[4] G. Box. Robustness in the Strategy of Scientific Model Building. , 1979 .
[5] Jong-Su Jeon,et al. Bridge fragilities to network fragilities in seismic scenarios: An integrated approach , 2021 .
[7] Luca Caracoglia,et al. Surrogate Model Monte Carlo simulation for stochastic flutter analysis of wind turbine blades , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.
[8] Luca Caracoglia,et al. A neural network surrogate model for the performance assessment of a vertical structure subjected to non-stationary, tornadic wind loads , 2020 .
[9] A. Horvath,et al. Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .
[10] Henry V. Burton,et al. Python-based computational platform to automate seismic design, nonlinear structural model construction and analysis of steel moment resisting frames , 2020, Engineering Structures.
[11] Junwon Seo,et al. Comparison of curved prestressed concrete bridge population response between area and spine modeling approaches toward efficient seismic vulnerability analysis , 2017 .
[12] Michele Barbato,et al. Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework , 2013 .
[13] Jamie E. Padgett,et al. Fragility and risk assessment of aboveground storage tanks subjected to concurrent surge, wave, and wind loads , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[14] Frank McKenna,et al. OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[15] Junwon Seo,et al. Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment , 2012 .
[16] Alireza Farzampour,et al. Probabilistic seismic performance and loss evaluation of a multi-story steel building equipped with butterfly-shaped fuses , 2020 .
[17] Francesco Petrini. Performance-based fire design of complex structures , 2013 .
[18] Barry J. Goodno,et al. Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events , 2012 .
[19] Seong-Hoon Hwang,et al. Machine learning-based approaches for seismic demand and collapse of ductile reinforced concrete building frames , 2020 .
[20] Bruno Sudret,et al. Comparative Study of Kriging and Support Vector Regression for Structural Engineering Applications , 2018, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering.
[21] Jesus M. de la Garza,et al. A multi-objective reliability-based decision support system for incorporating decision maker utilities in the design of infrastructure , 2019, Adv. Eng. Informatics.
[22] Qindan Huang,et al. Probabilistic prediction model for RC bond failure mode , 2021, Engineering Structures.
[23] Yongle Li,et al. Stochastic response of a cable-stayed bridge under non-stationary winds and waves using different surrogate models , 2020 .
[24] Melissa M. Bilec,et al. Review of approaches for integrating loss estimation and life cycle assessment to assess impacts of seismic building damage and repair , 2018, Engineering Structures.
[25] Manolis Papadrakakis,et al. Developing fragility curves based on neural network IDA predictions , 2011 .
[26] Jamie E. Padgett,et al. Fragility surrogate models for coastal bridges in hurricane prone zones , 2015 .
[27] Giuliano Augusti,et al. Performance-Based Wind Engineering: Towards a general procedure , 2011 .
[28] Carmine Galasso,et al. Gaussian process regression for seismic fragility assessment of building portfolios , 2019, Structural Safety.
[29] John W. van de Lindt,et al. Performance-Based Tsunami Engineering methodology for risk assessment of structures , 2017 .
[30] Amr S. Elnashai,et al. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .
[31] Upmanu Lall,et al. Copula-based reliability and sensitivity analysis of aging dams: Adaptive Kriging and polynomial chaos Kriging methods , 2021, Appl. Soft Comput..
[32] Richard Gagnon,et al. Performance of a sequential versus holistic building design approach using multi-objective optimization , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.
[33] Pinar Okumus,et al. Surface crack detection in concrete structures using video processing techniques , 2021, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.
[34] Khalid M. Mosalam,et al. PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited , 2013 .
[35] Carmine Galasso,et al. Gaussian process regression for fatigue reliability analysis of offshore wind turbines , 2021, Structural Safety.
[36] Junwon Seo,et al. Response Surface Metamodel-based Performance Reliability for Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with FRP sheets , 2015 .
[37] Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh,et al. Displacement-Based Framework for Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment , 2020, Journal of Earthquake Engineering.
[38] Ricardo O. Foschi,et al. SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY USING DIFFERENT NONLINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATIONS , 2009 .
[39] Asif Usmani,et al. An application of the PEER performance based earthquake engineering framework to structures in fire , 2014 .
[40] Ronald O. Hamburger,et al. THE ATC-58 PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF NEXT- GENERATION PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS , 2006 .
[41] Henry Burton,et al. Seismic Drift Demand Estimation for Steel Moment Frame Buildings: From Mechanics-Based to Data-Driven Models , 2021 .
[42] Jamie E. Padgett,et al. Investigation of multivariate seismic surrogate demand modeling for multi-response structural systems , 2020 .
[43] Keith Porter,et al. An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .
[44] Daniel W. Apley,et al. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models , 2016, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology).
[45] Gian Michele Calvi,et al. Quantifying seismic risk in structures via simplified demand–intensity models , 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[46] Wei-Chiang Hong,et al. Application of the Weighted K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Short-Term Load Forecasting , 2019, Energies.
[47] Wei-Xin Ren,et al. Risk-informed sensitivity analysis and optimization of seismic mitigation strategy using Gaussian process surrogate model , 2020 .
[48] Rasmus Lund Jensen,et al. Building simulations supporting decision making in early design – A review , 2016 .
[49] A. Varma,et al. Post-earthquake fire behavior and performance-based fire design of steel moment frame buildings , 2020 .
[50] Hussam Mahmoud,et al. Framework for a performance-based analysis of fires following earthquakes , 2018 .
[51] Jeonghyun Lee,et al. INSSEPT: An open-source relational database of seismic performance estimation to aid with early design of buildings , 2020 .
[52] Thomas Gernay,et al. Recommendations for performance-based fire design of composite steel buildings using computational analysis , 2020 .
[53] Tianqi Chen,et al. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.
[54] Jack P. Moehle,et al. Seismic design of reinforced concrete special moment frames :: a guide for practicing engineers , 2008 .
[55] Andrew S. Whittaker,et al. Multihazard Design and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Buildings with Special Moment–Resisting Steel Frames , 2019, Journal of Structural Engineering.
[56] Jason Brown,et al. A new approach to performance-based building design exploration using linear inverse modeling , 2018, Journal of Building Performance Simulation.
[57] I. G. Capeluto,et al. Advice tool for early design stages of intelligent facades based on energy and visual comfort approach , 2009 .
[58] Curt B. Haselton,et al. Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2012 .
[59] Deierlein Gg,et al. Quantifying the impacts of modeling uncertainties on the seismic drift demands and collapse risk of buildings with implications on seismic design checks , 2016 .
[60] Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al. Performance‐based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach , 2002 .
[61] Alice Alipour,et al. Surrogate models for high performance control systems in wind-excited tall buildings , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..
[62] Nicola Pedroni,et al. Seismic fragility analysis with artificial neural networks: Application to nuclear power plant equipment , 2018 .
[63] Nicolas Luco,et al. Effects of different sources of uncertainty and correlation on earthquake-generated losses , 2007 .
[64] Jong-Su Jeon,et al. Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes , 2018 .
[65] G. O’Reilly,et al. Integrating expected loss and collapse risk in performance-based seismic design of structures , 2021, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[66] A. O'Hagan,et al. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .
[67] A. Rodriguez-Marek,et al. The Impact of Hazard-Consistent Ground Motion Scenarios Selection on Structural Seismic Risk Estimation , 2021, Geo-Extreme 2021.
[68] Jesus M. de la Garza,et al. Sustainable Infrastructure Multi-Criteria Preference Assessment of Alternatives for Early Design , 2018, Automation in Construction.
[69] T. M. Leung,et al. A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings , 2015 .
[70] Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al. Kriging metamodeling in seismic risk assessment based on stochastic ground motion models , 2015 .
[71] Gian Michele Calvi,et al. Conceptual seismic design in performance‐based earthquake engineering , 2019 .
[72] Jinkoo Kim,et al. Computationally efficient framework for probabilistic collapse analysis of structures under extreme actions , 2018, Engineering Structures.
[73] Alice Alipour,et al. Multiple-Surrogate Models for Probabilistic Performance Assessment of Wind-Excited Tall Buildings under Uncertainties , 2020 .
[74] Junwon Seo,et al. Probabilistic seismic restoration cost estimation for transportation infrastructure portfolios with an emphasis on curved steel I-girder bridges , 2017 .
[75] Gregory G. Deierlein,et al. Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. II: Comparative Assessment of Nonductile and Ductile Moment Frames , 2011 .
[76] Junwon Seo,et al. Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges , 2013 .
[77] C. Chau,et al. Corrigendum to ""A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings"" [Appl. energy 143 (2015) 395-413] , 2015 .
[78] Anuj Karpatne,et al. A Data-Driven Approach to Full-Field Damage and Failure Pattern Prediction in Microstructure-Dependent Composites using Deep Learning , 2021, ArXiv.
[79] Ahmed Ghobarah,et al. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development , 2001 .
[80] Jack W. Baker,et al. Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation , 2008 .