The role of the P3 and CNV components in voluntary and automatic temporal orienting: A high spatial-resolution ERP study

ABSTRACT A main distinction has been proposed between voluntary and automatic mechanisms underlying temporal orienting (TO) of selective attention. Voluntary TO implies the endogenous directing of attention induced by symbolic cues. Conversely, automatic TO is exogenously instantiated by the physical properties of stimuli. A well‐known example of automatic TO is sequential effects (SEs), which refer to the adjustments in participants’ behavioral performance as a function of the trial‐by‐trial sequential distribution of the foreperiod between two stimuli. In this study a group of healthy adults underwent a cued reaction time task purposely designed to assess both voluntary and automatic TO. During the task, both post‐cue and post‐target event‐related potentials (ERPs) were recorded by means of a high spatial resolution EEG system. In the results of the post‐cue analysis, the P3a and P3b were identified as two distinct ERP markers showing distinguishable spatiotemporal features and reflecting automatic and voluntary a priori expectancy generation, respectively. The brain source reconstruction further revealed that distinct cortical circuits supported these two temporally dissociable components. Namely, the voluntary P3b was supported by a left sensorimotor network, while the automatic P3a was generated by a more distributed frontoparietal circuit. Additionally, post‐cue contingent negative variation (CNV) and post‐target P3 modulations were observed as common markers of voluntary and automatic expectancy implementation and response selection, although partially dissociable neural networks subserved these two mechanisms. Overall, these results provide new electrophysiological evidence suggesting that distinct neural substrates can be recruited depending on the voluntary or automatic cognitive nature of the cognitive mechanisms subserving TO. HIGHLIGHTSSelective attention can be oriented in time both voluntarily and automatically.Trial‐by‐trial foreperiod sequential effects automatically bias attention in time.Post‐cue P3a and P3b reflect automatic and voluntary expectancy generation.CNV is a common marker of voluntary and automatic expectancy implementation.Distinct cortical networks support voluntary and automatic temporal orienting.

[1]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Ralph Barnes,et al.  Expectancy, Attention, and Time , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  R. Goebel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  A. Vallesi,et al.  Spatiotemporally dissociable neural signatures for generating and updating expectation over time in children: A High Density-ERP study , 2016, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Patrizio Tressoldi,et al.  Driving with Intuition: A Preregistered Study about the EEG Anticipation of Simulated Random Car Accidents , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency , 1969 .

[8]  M. Scherg,et al.  Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Being prepared on time: on the importance of the previous foreperiod to current preparation, as reflected in speed, force and preparation-related brain potentials. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[10]  A. Vallesi,et al.  Dissociating Explicit and Implicit Timing in Parkinson’s Disease Patients: Evidence from Bisection and Foreperiod Tasks , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[12]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  R. Knight,et al.  Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3 , 1989, Brain Research.

[14]  P. Bernardis,et al.  Functional dissociations in temporal preparation: Evidence from dual-task performance , 2014, Cognition.

[15]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. , 1976, Behavioral biology.

[16]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  Intracerebral event-related potentials to subthreshold target stimuli , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  S. Galderisi,et al.  The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: A LORETA study , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[19]  R. Henson,et al.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural origins of the P300. , 2000, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[21]  Vincenza Tarantino,et al.  Spatiotemporal Neurodynamics Underlying Internally and Externally Driven Temporal Prediction: A High Spatial Resolution ERP Study , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Ángel Correa,et al.  Enhancing behavioural performance by visual temporal orienting , 2010 .

[23]  A. Vallesi,et al.  Neural dissociation of automatic and controlled temporal preparation by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Jennifer T. Coull,et al.  Behavioural Dissociation between Exogenous and Endogenous Temporal Orienting of Attention , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[27]  D. Heslenfeld,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: electrophysiological evidence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  The neural basis of temporal preparation: Insights from brain tumor patients , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  T. Shallice,et al.  Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Jordan J. Wehrman,et al.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception , 2018, Psychological Research.

[32]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Alick Elithorn,et al.  Central Inhibition—Some Refractory Observations , 1955 .

[35]  F. Vidal,et al.  Functional anatomy of timing differs for production versus prediction of time intervals , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  J. Coull.  Neural Substrates of Mounting Temporal Expectation , 2009, PLoS biology.

[37]  C Miniussi,et al.  Orienting attention in time. , 2001, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[38]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Brain networks of temporal preparation: A multiple regression analysis of neuropsychological data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[39]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Daniel Sanabria,et al.  Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory updating , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Functionally dissociating temporal and motor components of response preparation in left intraparietal sulcus , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  Michela Sarlo,et al.  Automatic Temporal Expectancy: A High-Density Event-Related Potential Study , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  Mark J. Hurlstone,et al.  Going with the Grain of Cognition: Applying Insights from Psychology to Build Support for Childhood Vaccination , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[45]  Juan Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal orienting deficit after prefrontal damage. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  A. Nobre,et al.  The hazards of time , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[49]  W. Meck,et al.  Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Substrates of Timing , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[50]  H. Woodrow.  The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[51]  Daniel Sanabria,et al.  Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation , 2012, Cognition.

[52]  R. Verleger,et al.  Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  D H DRAZIN,et al.  Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  J. T. Coull,et al.  Neural substrates of temporal attentional orienting , 2010 .

[55]  E Donchin,et al.  Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Differential roles for parietal and frontal cortices in fixed versus evolving temporal expectations: Dissociating prior from posterior temporal probabilities with fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[57]  Robert Roman,et al.  Intracerebral somatosensory event-related potentials: effect of response type (button pressing versus mental counting) on P3-like potentials within the human brain , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[59]  Vincenza Tarantino,et al.  Developmental Trajectories of Internally and Externally Driven Temporal Prediction , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  James V. Stone.  Independent component analysis: an introduction , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Giovanni Mento,et al.  The passive CNV: carving out the contribution of task-related processes to expectancy , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[62]  Anna Christina Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention to instants in time , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  W-J Huang,et al.  The neurophysiology of P 300--an integrated review. , 2015, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[64]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[65]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Synergistic Effect of Combined Temporal and Spatial Expectations on Visual Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Katherine A. Johnson,et al.  Citation : Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time , 2018 .

[67]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  CNV and temporal uncertainty with ‘ageing’ and ‘non-ageing’ S1–S2 intervals , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[69]  The perception of emotion and social cues in faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  A. Nobre,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  J. Ford,et al.  Combined event‐related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal—parietal cortex activation during target detection , 1997, Neuroreport.

[72]  E. Valenza,et al.  Spatiotemporal neurodynamics of automatic temporal expectancy in 9-month old infants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[73]  Jennifer T. Coull,et al.  Discrete Neuroanatomical Substrates for Generating and Updating Temporal Expectations , 2011 .

[74]  S. Los.  Foreperiod and Sequential Effects: theory and data , 2010 .

[75]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[77]  Pío Tudela,et al.  The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: determinants and attributes , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[78]  R. Knight,et al.  Effects of temporal-parietal lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[79]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[80]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[81]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[82]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  How can temporal expectations bias perception and action , 2010 .

[83]  Katherine A. Johnson,et al.  Children Can Implicitly, but Not Voluntarily, Direct Attention in Time , 2015, PloS one.

[84]  K. Lange.  The ups and downs of temporal orienting: a review of auditory temporal orienting studies and a model associating the heterogeneous findings on the auditory N1 with opposite effects of attention and prediction , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..