How satisfying is the Scale for Travel Satisfaction

Abstract The Satisfaction with Travel Scale (STS) has recently been developed to measure people’s satisfaction with travel. It supposedly consists of two affective and one cognitive dimension. As there have only been a few tests of its reliability and structure to date, this paper reports new tests using data on leisure trips from Ghent (Belgium). Differences in the reliability and structure of the STS by transport mode – car, public transport, bicycling and walking – are also considered. Overall, the results suggest that the specification of a single underlying dimension for affect rather than two offers a superior fit to the Ghent data, both for all modes combined and for car use and cycling separately. For public transport and walking a three-dimensional structure is more appropriate although individuals items do not load on the two affective dimensions as expected. Differences between previous studies and ours are partly caused by differences in how two of the scale’s items – alert/tired and confident/worried – are correlated with the other items. Future studies using the STS may want to adapt the structure of STS by omitting some items or replacing them with alternatives as this may reduce respondent burden and increase internal consistency of the STS.

[1]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs , 2013 .

[2]  D. Ettema,et al.  Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale , 2013 .

[3]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The road to happiness : Measuring Dutch car drivers’ satisfaction with travel , 2013 .

[4]  Anthony C Gatrell,et al.  Therapeutic mobilities: walking and 'steps' to wellbeing and health. , 2013, Health & place.

[5]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[7]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT: INFERENCES FROM COMPLAINTS AND NEGATIVE CRITICAL INCIDENTS , 1998 .

[8]  J. Russell Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[9]  David Bissell,et al.  Passenger Mobilities: Affective Atmospheres and the Sociality of Public Transport , 2010 .

[10]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[11]  T. Gärling,et al.  FREQUENCY OF NEGATIVE CRITICAL INCIDENTS AND SATISFACTION WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES , 2001 .

[12]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel , 2011 .

[13]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[14]  B. Anderson Becoming and Being Hopeful: Towards a Theory of Affect , 2006 .

[15]  D. Ettema,et al.  Happiness and Satisfaction with Work Commute , 2012, Social Indicators Research.

[16]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  The Promise of Happiness , 2010 .

[17]  J. Russell,et al.  A 12-Point Circumplex Structure of Core Affect. , 2011, Emotion.

[18]  Amalia Polydoropoulou,et al.  New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics , 2010 .

[19]  F. Penedo,et al.  Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity , 2005, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[20]  D. Ettema,et al.  How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport , 2012 .

[21]  Chu Kim-prieto,et al.  New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings , 2010 .

[22]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[23]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure of core affect. , 2007, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[24]  K. Berridge,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of pleasure and happiness , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool , 2011 .

[26]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility , 2016 .

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[29]  A. Ellaway,et al.  MEANS OF TRANSPORT AND ONTOLOGICAL SECURITY: DO CARS PROVIDE PSYCHO-SOCIAL BENEFITS TO THEIR USERS? , 2002 .

[30]  Alois Stutzer,et al.  Stress that Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox , 2008 .

[31]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: a six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. , 2007 .

[32]  D. Ettema,et al.  Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being , 2010 .

[33]  J. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales , 1999 .

[34]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Measuring service experience : Applying the satisfaction with travel scale in public transport , 2012 .