Discovering the interdisciplinary nature of Big Data research through social network analysis and visualization

Big Data is a research field involving a large number of collaborating disciplines. Based on bibliometric data downloaded from the Web of Science, this study applies various social network analysis and visualization tools to examine the structure and patterns of interdisciplinary collaborations, as well as the recently evolving overall pattern. This study presents the descriptive statistics of disciplines involved in publishing Big Data research; and network indicators of the interdisciplinary collaborations among disciplines, interdisciplinary communities, interdisciplinary networks, and changes in discipline communities over time. The findings indicate that the scope of disciplines involved in Big Data research is broad, but that the disciplinary distribution is unbalanced. The overall collaboration among disciplines tends to be concentrated in several key fields. According to the network indicators, Computer Science, Engineering, and Business and Economics are the most important contributors to Big Data research, given their position and role in the research collaboration network. Centering around a few important disciplines, all fields related to Big Data research are aggregated into communities, suggesting some related research areas, and directions for Big Data research. An ever-changing roster of related disciplines provides support, as illustrated by the evolving graph of communities.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996–2012) , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Philip H. Birnbaum,et al.  Academic Interdisciplinary Research: Characteristics of Successful Projects. , 1981 .

[3]  吴冷冬,et al.  Survey of Large-Scale Data Management Systems for Big Data Applications , 2015 .

[4]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Big data: From beginning to future , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[6]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[7]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  M. Hilbert,et al.  Big Data for Development: A Review of Promises and Challenges , 2016 .

[9]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: co-citation contexts and the role of analogy , 2010, Scientometrics.

[10]  Keqiu Li,et al.  Big data cloud and the frontier of computer science and technology , 2015, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[11]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment , 2009 .

[12]  Katy Börner,et al.  Plug-and-play macroscopes , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[13]  Paulo B. Góes,et al.  Editor's comments: big data and IS research , 2014 .

[14]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[15]  Nils O.E. Olsson,et al.  Use of big data in project evaluations , 2015 .

[16]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Coauthorship and Institutional Collaborations on Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Systematic Network Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Network of the core: mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domains , 2011, Scientometrics.

[19]  Muhammad Shiraz,et al.  Big Data: Survey, Technologies, Opportunities, and Challenges , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[20]  Muhammad Younas,et al.  Emerging trends and technologies in big data processing , 2015, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[21]  Zehra Taskin,et al.  Collaborative interdisciplinary astrobiology research: a bibliometric study of the NASA Astrobiology Institute , 2015, Scientometrics.

[22]  Ian Gray,et al.  Three maps and three misunderstandings: A digital mapping of climate diplomacy , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[23]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Mapping library and information science in China: a coauthorship network analysis , 2009, Scientometrics.

[24]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts , 2014, Big Data Soc..

[25]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level: The changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  Efficient Machine Learning for Big Data: A Review , 2015, Big Data Res..

[27]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Merritt Polk,et al.  Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report , 2011, Scientometrics.

[29]  Jonathan Young,et al.  The interdisciplinary structure of research on intercultural relations: a co-citation network analysis study , 2012, Scientometrics.

[30]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Trends in big data analytics , 2014, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[31]  Il-Yeol Song,et al.  Modeling and Management of Big Data: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[32]  Jean M. Alexander Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice (Book Review) , 1991 .

[33]  Sumit Kumar Banshal,et al.  Scientometric mapping of research on ‘Big Data’ , 2015, Scientometrics.

[34]  Ludovic Duponchel,et al.  Topological data analysis: A promising big data exploration tool in biology, analytical chemistry and physical chemistry. , 2016, Analytica chimica acta.

[35]  Honggang Wang,et al.  A survey of big data research , 2015, IEEE Network.

[36]  Sunil Erevelles,et al.  Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing , 2016 .

[37]  Yong Li,et al.  System architecture and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access networks , 2015, IEEE Netw..

[38]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[39]  Sebastian Grauwin,et al.  Mapping scientific institutions , 2011, Scientometrics.

[40]  C. L. Philip Chen,et al.  Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Yan Gao,et al.  A journal co-citation analysis of library and information science in China , 2011, Scientometrics.

[42]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Michael Mattioli,et al.  Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  How ‘Big Data’ Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case Study , 2015 .

[46]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship* , 2004 .

[47]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[48]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  The Big Data Landscape: Hurdles and Opportunities , 2015, DNIS.

[49]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[50]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Big Data: A Survey , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[52]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in BionanoScience , 2007 .

[53]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Mapping Change in Large Networks , 2008, PloS one.

[54]  Christophe Nicolle,et al.  Understandable Big Data: A survey , 2015, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[55]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[56]  Chengzhi Wang,et al.  Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography: a journal network analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[57]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[58]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[59]  Li Shuai,et al.  Big Data security and privacy: A review , 2014, China Communications.

[60]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Partitioning large signed two-mode networks: Problems and prospects , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[61]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Big data, big risks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[62]  Andrea De Mauro,et al.  What is big data? A consensual definition and a review of key research topics , 2015, AIP Conference Proceedings.

[63]  Alexander S. Szalay,et al.  Extreme Data-Intensive Scientific Computing , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.