Assessing a new clue to how much carbon plants take up

Current climate models disagree on how much carbon dioxide land ecosystems take up for photosynthesis. Tracking the stronger carbonyl sulfide signal could help.

[1]  C. Sweeney,et al.  Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA , 2017 .

[2]  Jesse W. Campbell,et al.  Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production , 2017, Nature.

[3]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake , 2016 .

[4]  R. Mahmood,et al.  Climate-Relevant Land Use and Land Cover Change Policies , 2016 .

[5]  Jesse W. Campbell,et al.  Changes in atmospheric carbonyl sulfide over the last 54,000 years inferred from measurements in Antarctic ice cores , 2016, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[6]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  K. Maseyk,et al.  A soil diffusion–reaction model for surface COS flux: COSSM v1 , 2015 .

[8]  J. Berry,et al.  Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake , 2015 .

[9]  J. Berry,et al.  Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide sources from anthropogenic activity: Implications for carbon cycle constraints , 2015 .

[10]  B. Poulter,et al.  A new model of the global biogeochemical cycle of carbonyl sulfide – Part 2: Use of carbonyl sulfide to constrain gross primary productivity in current vegetation models , 2014 .

[11]  L. Bopp,et al.  A new model for the global biogeochemical cycle of carbonyl sulfide – Part 1: Assessment of direct marine emissions with an oceanic general circulation and biogeochemistry model , 2014 .

[12]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. Montzka,et al.  Constraining surface carbon fluxes using in situ measurements of carbonyl sulfide and carbon dioxide , 2014 .

[14]  Jesse W. Campbell,et al.  A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: A possible new window on the carbon cycle , 2013 .

[15]  Dan Yakir,et al.  Ecosystem photosynthesis inferred from measurements of carbonyl sulphide flux , 2013 .

[16]  E. Schnug,et al.  Sulfur fertilization and fungal infections affect the exchange of H(2)S and COS from agricultural crops. , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[17]  F. Loreto,et al.  Carbonyl sulfide (COS) as a tracer for canopy photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance: potential and limitations , 2011, Plant, cell & environment.

[18]  S. Montzka,et al.  Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchange. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[19]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Photosynthetic Control of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide During the Growing Season , 2008, Science.

[20]  C. Sweeney,et al.  On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2 , 2007 .

[21]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[22]  J. Kesselmeier,et al.  Global uptake of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by terrestrial vegetation: Estimates corrected by deposition velocities normalized to the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) , 2005 .

[23]  Gregg Marland,et al.  The climatic impacts of land surface change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change mitigation policy , 2003 .

[24]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Measurements of an anomalous global methane increase during 1998 , 2001 .

[25]  J. Kesselmeier,et al.  Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (COS) between agricultural plants and the atmosphere: Studies on the deposition of COS to peas, corn and rapeseed , 1993 .

[26]  A soil di ff usion-reaction model for surface COS flux: COSSM v1 , 2022 .