Refining the in vitro and in vivo critical parameters for P-glycoprotein, [I]/IC50 and [I2]/IC50, that allow for the exclusion of drug candidates from clinical digoxin interaction studies.

The objective of this work was to further investigate the reasons for disconcordant clinical digoxin drug interactions (DDIs) particularly for false negative where in vitro data suggests no P-glycoprotein (P-gp) related DDI but a clinically relevant DDI is evident. Applying statistical analyses of binary classification and receiver operating characteristic (ROC), revised cutoff values for ratio of [I]/IC(50) < 0.1 and [I(2)]/IC(50) < 5 were identified to minimize the error rate, a reduction of false negative rate to 9% from 36% (based on individual ratios). The steady state total C(max) at highest dose of the inhibitor is defined as [I] and the ratio of the nominal maximal gastrointestinal concentration determined for highest dose per 250 mL volume defined [I(2)](.) We also investigated the reliability of the clinical data to see if recommendations can be made on values that would allow predictions of 25% change in digoxin exposure. The literature derived clinical digoxin interaction studies were statistically powered to detect relevant changes in exposure associated with digitalis toxicities. Our analysis identified that many co-meds administered with digoxin are cardiovascular (CV) agents. Moreover, our investigations also suggest that the presence of CV agents may alter cardiac output and/or kidney function that may act alone or are additional components to enhance digoxin exposure along with P-gp interaction. While we recommend digoxin as the probe substrate to define P-gp inhibitory potency for clinical assessment, we observed high concordance in P-gp inhibitory potency for calcein AM as a probe substrate.

[1]  Caroline A. Lee,et al.  Drug–Drug Interactions Mediated Through P‐Glycoprotein: Clinical Relevance and In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation Using Digoxin as a Probe Drug , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  J. Wilson,et al.  Comparative effects of verapamil and isradipine on steady‐state digoxin kinetics , 1988, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  T. Abe,et al.  Isolation and characterization of a digoxin transporter and its rat homologue expressed in the kidney. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M Zschiesche,et al.  Oral bioavailability of digoxin is enhanced by talinolol: Evidence for involvement of intestinal P‐glycoprotein , 2000, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  D. Thakker,et al.  Rhodamine 123 Requires Carrier-Mediated Influx for Its Activity as a P-Glycoprotein Substrate in Caco-2 Cells , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[6]  F. Loor,et al.  Ranking of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors by a calcein-AM fluorometry screening assay. , 1996, Anti-cancer drugs.

[7]  R. Stern,et al.  Effect of Troglitazone on Steady‐State Pharmacokinetics of Digoxin , 1998, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[8]  A L Waldo,et al.  A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  E. J. Brown,et al.  The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Polli,et al.  IN VITRO P-GLYCOPROTEIN INHIBITION ASSAYS FOR ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL DRUG INTERACTION POTENTIAL OF NEW DRUG CANDIDATES: A RECOMMENDATION FOR PROBE SUBSTRATES , 2006, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[11]  E. Wang,et al.  The farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor SCH66336 is a potent inhibitor of MDR1 product P-glycoprotein. , 2001, Cancer research.

[12]  R. Ogilvie,et al.  Digoxin-cyclosporine interaction: severe digitalis toxicity after cyclosporine treatment. , 1988, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[13]  V. P. Butler,et al.  Inactivation of digoxin by the gut flora: reversal by antibiotic therapy. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Galanter,et al.  Mechanisms, Manifestations, and Management of Digoxin Toxicity in the Modern Era , 2006, American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions.

[15]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A concurrent audit of high digoxin plasma levels , 1994, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  S. Chong,et al.  P-gp Inhibition Potential in Cell-Based Models: Which “Calculation” Method is the Most Accurate? , 2008, The AAPS Journal.

[17]  K. Paull,et al.  P-glycoprotein substrates and antagonists cluster into two distinct groups. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[18]  P. Neuvonen,et al.  Itraconazole decreases renal clearance of digoxin. , 1997, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[19]  E. Hazan,et al.  Relationship between high serum digoxin levels and toxicity. , 1997, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  W. Haefeli,et al.  Substantial pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and ritonavir in healthy volunteers , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  B. H. Stewart,et al.  Atorvastatin Coadministration May Increase Digoxin Concentrations by Inhibition of Intestinal P‐Glycoprotein‐Mediated Secretion , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[22]  I. Pastan,et al.  Fluorescent cellular indicators are extruded by the multidrug resistance protein. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  I. Pajeva,et al.  New functional assay of P-glycoprotein activity using Hoechst 33342. , 2007, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[24]  L. Bertilsson,et al.  Inhibition of the sulfoxidation of omeprazole by ketoconazole in poor and extensive metabolizers of S‐mephenytoin , 1997, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  Ronald T. Borchardt,et al.  Are MDCK Cells Transfected with the Human MDR1 Gene a Good Model of the Human Intestinal Mucosa? , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[26]  I. Pastan,et al.  Evidence for two nonidentical drug-interaction sites in the human P-glycoprotein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Polli,et al.  Kinetic Identification of Membrane Transporters That Assist P-glycoprotein-Mediated Transport of Digoxin and Loperamide through a Confluent Monolayer of MDCKII-hMDR1 Cells , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[28]  L Landmann,et al.  Organic anion-transporting polypeptide B (OATP-B) and its functional comparison with three other OATPs of human liver. , 2001, Gastroenterology.

[29]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[30]  S. Ekins,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of inhibitors of P-glycoprotein. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[31]  V. Ling,et al.  P-glycoprotein-mediated Hoechst 33342 transport out of the lipid bilayer. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[32]  M. Stolar,et al.  Multiple‐Dose Pharmacokinetics of the Selective Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist, Varenicline, in Healthy Smokers , 2006, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[33]  J. Polli,et al.  The elementary mass action rate constants of P-gp transport for a confluent monolayer of MDCKII-hMDR1 cells. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[34]  D. Ouellet,et al.  Effect of Lasofoxifene on the Pharmacokinetics of Digoxin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women , 2005, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[35]  J. Polli,et al.  Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery. , 2001, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[36]  N. Wood,et al.  Voriconazole does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. , 2003, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[37]  G. M. Pollack,et al.  Kinetic Considerations for the Quantitative Assessment of Efflux Activity and Inhibition: Implications for Understanding and Predicting the Effects of Efflux Inhibition , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.