UAS-GEOBIA Approach to Sapling Identification in Jack Pine Barrens after Fire

Jack pine (pinus banksiana) forests are unique ecosystems controlled by wildfire. Understanding the traits of revegetation after wildfire is important for sustainable forest management, as these forests not only provide economic resources, but also are home to specialized species, like the Kirtland Warbler (Setophaga kirtlandii). Individual tree detection of jack pine saplings after fire events can provide information about an environment’s recovery. Traditional satellite and manned aerial sensors lack the flexibility and spatial resolution required for identifying saplings in early post-fire analysis. Here we evaluated the use of unmanned aerial systems and geographic object-based image analysis for jack pine sapling identification in a region burned during the 2012 Duck Lake Fire in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Results of this study indicate that sapling identification accuracies can top 90%, and that accuracy improves with the inclusion of red and near infrared spectral bands. Results also indicated that late season imagery performed best when discriminating between young (<5 years) jack pines and herbaceous ground cover in these environments.

[1]  Mariana Belgiu,et al.  Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions , 2016 .

[2]  Tao Liu,et al.  A fully learnable context-driven object-based model for mapping land cover using multi-view data from unmanned aircraft systems , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[3]  T. A. Black,et al.  Remote sensing of photosynthetic-light-use efficiency of boreal forest , 2000 .

[4]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Exploiting machine learning algorithms for tree species classification in a semiarid woodland using RapidEye image , 2013 .

[5]  Jan Komárek,et al.  The potential of Unmanned Aerial Systems: A tool towards precision classification of hard-to-distinguish vegetation types? , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[6]  S. Saunders,et al.  Characterizing historical and modern fire regimes in Michigan (USA): A landscape ecosystem approach , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[8]  S. Delagrange,et al.  Reconstruction and analysis of a deciduous sapling using digital photographs or terrestrial-LiDAR technology. , 2011, Annals of botany.

[9]  C. Silva,et al.  Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest , 2017 .

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  Soil and Atmosphere Influences on the Spectra of Partial Canopies , 1988 .

[11]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Good Practices for Object-Based Accuracy Assessment , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[12]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The red edge position and shape as indicators of plant chlorophyll content, biomass and hydric status. , 1994 .

[13]  B. Kleinschmit,et al.  Testing the red edge channel for improving land-use classifications based on high-resolution multi-spectral satellite data , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[15]  D. Rothstein,et al.  How well does Kirtland's warbler management emulate the effects of natural disturbance on stand structure in Michigan jack pine forests? , 2009 .

[16]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Evaluating the impact of red-edge band from Rapideye image for classifying insect defoliation levels , 2014 .

[17]  Alain Leduc,et al.  Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Stand- and forest-level considerations , 1999 .

[18]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Historical Changes in the Forests of the Luce District of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan , 2000 .

[19]  Giorgos Mallinis,et al.  On the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Tree Species Classification with Random Forest Using Very High Spatial Resolution 8-Band WorldView-2 Satellite Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[22]  P. Curran,et al.  Technical Note Grass chlorophyll and the reflectance red edge , 1996 .

[23]  Douglas J. King,et al.  Automated tree crown detection and delineation in high-resolution digital camera imagery of coniferous forest regeneration , 2002 .

[24]  G. Whitney.  An ecological history of the Great Lakes forest of Michigan , 1987 .

[25]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Monitoring individual tree‐based change with airborne lidar , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[26]  Christopher Potter,et al.  Analysis of sapling density regeneration in Yellowstone National Park with hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2012 .

[27]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Random Forests for land cover classification , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[28]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  Broadband, red-edge information from satellites improves early stress detection in a New Mexico conifer woodland , 2011 .

[29]  WhiteheadKen,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 1: a review of progress and challenges1 , 2014 .

[30]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[31]  D. Yaussy,et al.  Effects of repeated prescribed fires on the structure, composition, and regeneration of mixed-oak forests in Ohio , 2005 .

[32]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Comparison of ALS- and UAV(SfM)-derived high-density point clouds for individual tree detection in Eucalyptus plantations , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[33]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[34]  R. Myneni,et al.  Atmospheric effects and spectral vegetation indices , 1994 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[36]  Ivan Lizarazo,et al.  Accuracy assessment of object-based image classification: another STEP , 2014 .

[37]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Individual Tree Detection and Classification with UAV-Based Photogrammetric Point Clouds and Hyperspectral Imaging , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[38]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Evaluating Tree Detection and Segmentation Routines on Very High Resolution UAV LiDAR Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[39]  K. Oost,et al.  Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms , 2016 .

[40]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Effects of land-use and landscape structure on holm oak recruitment and regeneration at farm level in Quercus ilex L. dehesas , 2004 .

[41]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification , 2022 .

[42]  E. Middleton,et al.  Seasonal variability in foliar characteristics and physiology for boreal forest species at the five Saskatchewan tower sites during the 1994 Boreal Ecosystem‐Atmosphere Study , 1997 .

[43]  Herbert Y Kressel,et al.  Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? , 2010, Radiology.

[44]  Le Wang,et al.  How to assess the accuracy of the individual tree-based forest inventory derived from remotely sensed data: a review , 2016 .

[45]  Albert Porcar-Castell,et al.  Physiology of the seasonal relationship between the photochemical reflectance index and photosynthetic light use efficiency , 2012, Oecologia.