Geographical proximity and the role of the quality of academic research to the university-industry linkages

th 2013) Abstract This study examines how the geographical proximity of university-industry linkages relates to the quality of an institution's research, local efforts in research and development (R&D), and characteristics of a region's production structure. The important role of universities for the firms' innovative efforts has been widely accepted in the literature. In particular, universities serve as a source of new scientific and technological knowledge. Geographical proximity can facilitate an interactive learning process between universities and industry by allowing for frequent interaction and face-to-face contact, which speeds the transmission of local knowledge spillovers. However, it is also necessary to analyse the quality of the university's academic research because state-of-the-art scientific and technological expertise is required for the development of advanced industry innovations. This level of expertise is more commonly found at top-tier universities. To examine this point, the Directory of Research Groups from the Lattes database of the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology was used. The Lattes database collects and compiles information on the activities of research groups in Brazil and their interactions with firms. By using these data, it was possible to identify factors that influence geographical distance in university-industry linkages, including the quality of academic research, local research efforts, and the characteristics of the local production structure. This study aims to contribute to the debate on the role of geographical proximity in university-industry interactions by providing an analysis of the issue in Brazil. Furthermore, the empirical model developed for this analysis introduces control variables that will help to identify the role of geographical proximity. The findings from this study show a positive correlation between the quality of research groups and the mean distance of interactions with firms. Top-tier research groups interact with both local firms (due to the convenience of being co-located) and more distant producers in need of cutting-edge research and expertise to support advanced innovation. Thus, it is evident that the costs of establishing long-distance university-industry relationships are overcome by the benefits offered by interacting with high capability research groups to solve complex and highly specific problems.

[1]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships , 2010 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[4]  Valeria Arza,et al.  Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina , 2010 .

[5]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[6]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[7]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[8]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[9]  Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque,et al.  University—industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: Evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil , 2009 .

[10]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[11]  Laura Abramovsky,et al.  University Research and the Location of Business R&D , 2007 .

[12]  Alessandro Muscio University‐industry linkages: What are the determinants of distance in collaborations?* , 2013 .

[13]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[14]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[16]  Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque,et al.  Academy—industry links in Brazil: evidence about channels and benefits for firms and researchers , 2010 .

[17]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[18]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[19]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[20]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[21]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[22]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[23]  Wilson Suzigan,et al.  University and industry linkages in brazil: some preliminary and descriptive results , 2009 .

[24]  C. Autant‐Bernard,et al.  Social distance versus spatial distance in R & D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[25]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[27]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Universities and Innovation in Space , 2007 .