micrObs – A customizable time-lapse camera for ecological studies

Abstract Camera traps for motion-triggered or continuous time-lapse recordings are readily available on the market. For demanding applications in ecology and environmental sciences, however, commercial systems often lack flexibility to freely adjust recording time intervals, suffer from mechanical component wear, and can be difficult to combine with auxiliary sensors such as GPS, weather stations, or light sensors. We present a robust time-lapse camera system that has been operating continuously since 2013 under the harsh climatic conditions of the Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic regions. Thus far, we have recorded over one million images with individual cameras. The system consumes 122 mW of power in standby mode and captures up to 200,000 high-resolution (16 MPix) images without maintenance such as battery or image memory replacement. It offers time-lapse intervals between 2 s and 1 hour, low-light or night-time power saving, and data logging capabilities for additional inputs such as GPS and weather data.

[1]  J. Butler,et al.  Coordinated Movements Prevent Jamming in an Emperor Penguin Huddle , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  Colin Southwell,et al.  An automated camera system for remote monitoring in polar environments , 2009 .

[3]  Richard C. Gerum,et al.  Phase transitions in huddling emperor penguins , 2018, Journal of physics D: Applied physics.

[4]  Richard C. Gerum,et al.  A remote‐controlled observatory for behavioural and ecological research: A case study on emperor penguins , 2018 .

[5]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Population trends of penguins in the French Southern Territories , 2020, Polar Biology.

[6]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Thermal Imaging Reveals Significantly Smaller Brazilian Free-Tailed Bat Colonies Than Previously Estimated , 2008, Journal of Mammalogy.

[7]  Marc Van Droogenbroeck,et al.  ViBE: A powerful random technique to estimate the background in video sequences , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[8]  Andrea Cavagna,et al.  Collective Behaviour without Collective Order in Wild Swarms of Midges , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Reconstructing the flight kinematics of swarming and mating in wild mosquitoes , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[11]  M. Donahue,et al.  CoralCam: A flexible, low-cost ecological monitoring platform , 2019, HardwareX.

[12]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Time-lapse imagery and volunteer classifications from the Zooniverse Penguin Watch project , 2018, Scientific Data.

[13]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Optical flow, flock behaviour and chicken welfare , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Y. Handrich,et al.  Energy saving in huddling penguins , 1997, Nature.

[16]  A. Hobday,et al.  A high‐resolution panorama camera system for monitoring colony‐wide seabird nesting behaviour , 2015 .