The continuing momentum of carbon nanotube research is driven by a number of unresolved issues, particularly those associated with high-temperature synthesis, but also by the challenge of translating the exciting physical properties of the individual nanotubes into useful materials with new properties and applications. A process by which carbon nanotube fi bers can be spun directly from the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reaction zone was fi rst reported in 2004. [ 1 ] The fi ber formed consisted of comparatively large diameter ( ≈ 7 nm) double-walled nanotubes that collapse to form stacks of graphene-like layers. [ 2 ] Also shown was the potential for exceptional axial mechanical properties. [ 3 , 4 ] The addition of sulfur in the right proportion is key to the formation of a cloud of entangled nanotubes that have suffi cient mechanical integrity to be drawn out of the reactor as a continuous fi ber. The major role of the sulfur has been seen as a “promoter” as suggested much earlier by Kiang et al. [ 5 , 6 ] In the continuous spinning process, sulfur has been identifi ed as segregating to the surface of the iron catalyst particles and the interface between the particle and the nanotube, [ 7 ] an effect recently simulated using molecular dynamics for Mo–S [ 8 ] and since confi rmed for Fe–S, [ 9 ] yet well known in the literature on cast irons. [ 10 ] The nanotubes produced by the process are exceptionally long, some 100 000 times their diameter, and their growth to this length over a few seconds at 1200 ° C seems associated with the promoting effect of added sulfur. Here we report the observation that if the sulfur is made available soon after the ferrocene is fi rst cracked to nucleate the fl oating iron catalyst particles, then it retards the growth of the particles so they nucleate single-walled nanotubes, which are then extracted as continuous ≈ 10 μ m diameter fi ber. Additionally, the fact that armchair (and thus metallic) nanotubes are dominant in the fi ber is surprising and adds further piquancy to their potential applicability. The process is described in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). We note (Supporting Information, Table S1) that the window of composition ratios for successful spinning is centred on Fe/C 0.008, the same as for successful spinning from thiophene, but the required Fe/S ratio is 0.080 for thiophene compared with 0.006 for the carbon disulfi de. Furthermore, the results provide additional input to the on-going debate as to the source of chirality preference in as-grown SWNTs [ 11–14 ] and is discussed in the context of three specifi c models: imprinting catalyst structure, [ 15 , 16 ] cap control of chirality, [ 17 , 18 ] and dislocation models of nanotube growth and reorientation. [ 18–20 ]
[1]
J. Elliott,et al.
A model for the strength of yarn-like carbon nanotube fibers.
,
2011,
ACS nano.
[2]
M. Dresselhaus,et al.
Dielectric constant model for environmental effects on the exciton energies of single wall carbon nanotubes
,
2010
.
[3]
Alan H. Windle,et al.
Carbon Nanotubes with Catalyst Controlled Chiral Angle
,
2010
.
[4]
P. Puech,et al.
Formation mechanism of peapod-derived double-walled carbon nanotubes
,
2010
.
[5]
C. Kiang,et al.
Helicity Distributions of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Its Implication on the Growth Mechanism
,
2010,
Materials.
[6]
Y. Shibuta,et al.
Energetic Stability of Molybdenum Nanoclusters Studied with Basin-Hopping Monte Carlo and Semi-Empirical Quantum Methods
,
2009
.
[7]
A. Harutyunyan,et al.
Dislocation theory of chirality-controlled nanotube growth
,
2009,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8]
I. Kinloch,et al.
The role of sulphur in the synthesis of carbon nanotubes by chemical vapour deposition at high temperatures.
,
2008,
Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
[9]
Michael Sennett,et al.
High-Performance Carbon Nanotube Fiber
,
2007,
Science.
[10]
I. Kinloch,et al.
High Performance Fibres from ‘Dog Bone’ Carbon Nanotubes
,
2007
.
[11]
S. Reich,et al.
Structure and formation energy of carbon nanotube caps
,
2005,
cond-mat/0509164.
[12]
J. Ihm,et al.
Microscopic mechanism of fullerene fusion
,
2004
.
[13]
Ya-Li Li,et al.
Direct Spinning of Carbon Nanotube Fibers from Chemical Vapor Deposition Synthesis
,
2004,
Science.
[14]
A. Nasibulin,et al.
The role of metal nanoparticles in the catalytic production of single-walled carbon nanotubes—a review
,
2003
.
[15]
Francisco Pompeo,et al.
Narrow (n,m)-distribution of single-walled carbon nanotubes grown using a solid supported catalyst.
,
2003,
Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[16]
M. Dresselhaus,et al.
Phonons in carbon nanotubes
,
2000
.
[17]
C. Kiang.
Growth of Large-Diameter Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
,
2000
.
[18]
Boris I. Yakobson,et al.
Mechanical relaxation and “intramolecular plasticity” in carbon nanotubes
,
1998
.
[19]
D. Bethune,et al.
Vapor-phase self-assembly of carbon nanomaterials
,
1996
.
[20]
W. Goddard,et al.
Catalytic effects of heavy metals on the growth of carbon nanotubes and nanoparticles
,
1996
.