Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography

Current 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic scanners (MDCT) utilize retrospective overlapping helical acquisition (RS-OHA) which imparts a higher than desired radiation dose. Although the radiation burden of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) can be efficiently reduced by dose modulation and limiting field of view, a further decrease in radiation without compromising diagnostic image quality would be indeed very desirable. An alternative imaging mode is the axial prospective ECG-triggering acquisition (prospective gating). This study was done to compare the effective radiation dose and the image quality with two techniques to reduce radiation doses with CTA studies utilizing 64-MDCT scanners. The study included 149 consecutive patients (48 females and 101 males) 64-MDCT (mean age = 67 ± 11 years, 72.2% male). Patients underwent CT coronary angiography using one of three algorithms: retrospective triggering with dose modulation; prospective triggering with padding (step and shoot acquisition with additional adjacent phases); and prospective triggering without padding (single phase acquisition only). Based on body habitus, two different voltages were utilized: 100 kVp (<85 kg) or 120 kVp (>85 kg). Radiation doses and image quality (signal to noise ratio) was measured for each patient, and compared between different acquisition protocols. The signal to-noise ratio of the ascending aorta (SNR-AA) was calculated from the mean pixel values of the contrast-filled left ventricular chamber divided by the standard deviation of these pixel values. Use of 100 kVp reduced radiation dose 41.5% using prospective triggering and 39.6% using retrospective imaging as compared to 120 kVp (P < 0.001). Use of prospective imaging reduced radiation exposure by 82.6% as compared to retrospective imaging (P < 0.001). Using both prospective imaging and 100 kVp without padding (single phase data, no other phases obtained), radiation dose was reduced by 90% (P < 0.001). In terms of image quality, the coefficient of variation of ascending aortic contrast enhancement between kVp of 120 and kVp of 100 was 6% (1.05, 95 CI 0.93–1.17), and 7.8% (0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.2) at the pulmonary artery. The prospective ECG-Triggered acquisition and 100 kVp images were of diagnostic quality, allowing adequate assessment in all patients. CTA using PA and 100 kVp reduced the radiation dose by up to 90% without compromising the image quality.

[1]  H. Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions , 2000, European Radiology.

[2]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[3]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[4]  N. Theocharopoulos,et al.  PATIENT EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSE AND ASSOCIATED RISK FROM TRANSMISSION SCANS USING 153GD LINE SOURCES IN CARDIAC SPECT STUDIES , 2002, Health physics.

[5]  James H Thrall,et al.  Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  Herbert Bruder,et al.  Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[7]  C. McCollough Patient Dose in Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2003, Herz.

[8]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jonas Nilsson Althén,et al.  Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[13]  F Cademartiri,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice computed tomography. , 2005, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[14]  Axel Stäbler,et al.  Dose Reduction in Multislice Computed Tomography , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[18]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  J. Paul,et al.  MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  M. Budoff,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: Diagnostic utility and integration in clinical practice , 2006, Clinical cardiology.

[21]  Philipp Bruners,et al.  Low Tube Voltage Improves Computed Tomography Imaging of Delayed Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in an Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction Model , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[22]  D. Dowe Low-dose 'quadruple rule-out' portends era of half-body CTA , 2007 .

[23]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography using multislice computed tomography , 2005, Heart.

[24]  Kelley R Branch,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Current status and future directions in technical developments of cardiac computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[26]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[27]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[28]  Masao Kiguchi,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[29]  C. Claussen,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[30]  Arik Wolak,et al.  Algorithm for radiation dose reduction with helical dual source coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[31]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  D. Dey,et al.  Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[33]  S. Abbara,et al.  Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose , 2008 .

[34]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[35]  M. Budoff,et al.  A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.