Behavior‐dependent activity labeling in the central complex of Drosophila during controlled visual stimulation

3H‐2‐deoxyglucose (2‐DG) is used as a histological marker to study the spatial distribution of neuronal activity in the central brain of Drosophila melanogaster under controlled stimulus conditions. Tethered flies injected with the label are kept for 45–90 minutes in the center of a rotating drum carrying on its periphery a singe black vertical stripe or a periodic grating. In either stimulus situation, one‐half of the flies walk on top of a small black styrofoam ball floating on ajet of air, and one‐half are kept flying 1.5 mm above the ball. (1) During walking on the styrofoam ball little 2‐DG accumulates in the central brain. The area in and around the ellipsoid body as well as several tracts are weakly labeled. (2) After flight, labeling patterns are more distinct. The following labeled structures can be identified: ventral bodies, ring neurons of the ellipsoid body, the region of the inferior bridge, fiber tracts connecting the central complex to other parts of the protocerebrum, and tracts in the subesophageal and dorsal brain. These contrast with fan‐shaped body and protocerebral lobes, which are only weakly labeled. (3) Not only flight and walking lead to distinct staining patterns but also the two visual stimuli. With the single stripe, in most flies the caudal layers of the ellipsoid body accumulate more 2‐DG than the rostral ones. With the striped drum, the ellipsoid body is uniformly labeled. (4) Other stimulus‐related features are found less regularly: Unilateral distribution of 2‐DG in or around the noduli was observed in several flies that had been exposed to a rotating single stripe. In one preparation, two strongly marked individual neurons of the protocerebral bridge can be tentatively identified. The labeling patterns support earlier notions that the central complex is involved in the initiation and organization of behavior and that it integrates visual data of the two brain hemispheres. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Uwe Homberg,et al.  Interneurones of the central complex in the bee brain (Apis mellifera, L.) , 1985 .

[2]  Franz Huber,et al.  Untersuchungen über die Funktion des Zentralnervensystems und insbesondere des Gehirnes bei der Fortbewegung und der Lauterzeugung der Grillen , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[3]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  2-Deoxy-D-glucose maps movement-specific nervous activity in the second visual ganglion of Drosophila. , 1979, Science.

[4]  I. Bülthoff.  Deoxyglucose mapping of nervous activity induced in Drosophila brain by visual movement. 3. Outer rhabdomeres absent JK84, small optics lobes KS58 and no object fixation EB12, visual mutants. , 1986 .

[5]  M. Egelhaaf.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[6]  Erich Buchner,et al.  [3H]2-Deoxyglucose mapping of odor-induced neuronal activity in the antennal lobes of Drosophila melanogaster , 1984, Brain Research.

[7]  E. Buchner,et al.  Identification of [3H]deoxyglucose-labelled interneurons in the fly from serial autoradiographs , 1984, Brain Research.

[8]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Genetic dissection of optomotor behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Studies on wild-type and the mutant optomotor-blindH31. , 1986, Journal of neurogenetics.

[9]  R. Strauss,et al.  A higher control center of locomotor behavior in the Drosophila brain , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Milde.  Visual responses of interneurones in the posterior median protocerebrum and the central complex of the honeybee Apis mellifera , 1988 .

[11]  M Heisenberg,et al.  No-bridge of Drosophila melanogaster: portrait of a structural brain mutant of the central complex. , 1992, Journal of neurogenetics.

[12]  U. Homberg,et al.  Neuroarchitecture of the central complex in the brain of the locust Schistocerca gregaria and S. americana as revealed by serotonin immunocytochemistry , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. E. Power,et al.  The brain of Drosophila melanogaster , 1943 .

[14]  E. Buchner,et al.  Mapping stimulus-induced nervous activity in small brains by [3H]2-deoxy-D-glucose , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[15]  M. Egelhaaf.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[16]  R. Wolf,et al.  On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation ofDrosophila melanogaster , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  I. Bülthoff.  Deoxyglucose mapping of nervous activity induced in Drosophila brain by visual movement. 2. Optomotor blind H31 and lobula plate-less N684 visual mutants. , 1985 .

[18]  K. Götz.  Visual guidance in Drosophila. , 1980, Basic life sciences.

[19]  E. Buchner,et al.  Anatomical Localization of Functional Activity in Flies Using 3H-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose , 1983 .

[20]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Identification of H1 visual interneuron in Drosophila by [3H]2-deoxyglucose uptake during stationary flight , 1990, Brain Research.