Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing

[1]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[3]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[4]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[5]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? , 1980, Cognition.

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[10]  Paul Griffith Gorrell,et al.  STUDIES OF HUMAN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING: RANKED-PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL MODELS , 1987 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[12]  M. Coltheart.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[13]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing , 1989 .

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Edward Gibson,et al.  A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .

[16]  J. Henderson,et al.  Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .

[17]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[18]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Statistical language learning , 1997 .

[19]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[20]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[21]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation , 1994 .

[22]  Paul Gorrell.  Syntax and Parsing , 1995 .

[23]  Frédéric Alexandre,et al.  Connectionist-Symbolic Integration: From Unified to Hybrid Approaches , 1996 .

[24]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Suzanne Stevenson Paolo Merlo.  Lexical structure and parsing complexity , 1997 .

[26]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .

[27]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility , 1998 .

[28]  Suzanne Stevenson,et al.  Parsing as Incremental Restructuring , 1998 .

[29]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[30]  M. Pickering,et al.  Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .

[31]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[32]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .

[33]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  The Modular Statistical Hypothesis: Exploring Lexical Category Ambiguity , 1999 .

[34]  M. Pickering,et al.  Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing , 1999 .

[35]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Unrestricted race: A new model of syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2000 .

[36]  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[37]  G. Kempen,et al.  Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.

[38]  W. Snyder.  An Experimental Investigation of Syntactic Satiation Effects , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[39]  M W Crocker,et al.  Wide-Coverage Probabilistic Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[40]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[41]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .

[42]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Grammatical Search and Reanalysis , 2001 .

[43]  K Christianson,et al.  Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[44]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The Preservation of Structure in Language Comprehension: Is Reanalysis the Last Resort? , 2001 .

[45]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Syntactic Complexity in Ambiguity Resolution , 2002 .

[47]  Forrest David Braze.  Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study , 2002 .

[48]  John Hale,et al.  The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[49]  C. Phillips.  Linear Order and Constituency , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[50]  W. Tabor,et al.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.