Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Janet D. Fodor,et al. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.
[2] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .
[3] D. Swinney. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .
[4] Lyn Frazier,et al. ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .
[5] Lyn Frazier,et al. Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? , 1980, Cognition.
[6] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[7] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[8] J. Woolley,et al. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[9] C. Clifton,et al. The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .
[10] Paul Griffith Gorrell,et al. STUDIES OF HUMAN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING: RANKED-PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL MODELS , 1987 .
[11] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[12] M. Coltheart. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .
[13] Gerard Kempen,et al. Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing , 1989 .
[14] J. Henderson,et al. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] Edward Gibson,et al. A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .
[16] J. Henderson,et al. Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .
[17] Matthew Flatt,et al. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .
[18] Eugene Charniak,et al. Statistical language learning , 1997 .
[19] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[20] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[21] Suzanne Stevenson,et al. Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation , 1994 .
[22] Paul Gorrell. Syntax and Parsing , 1995 .
[23] Frédéric Alexandre,et al. Connectionist-Symbolic Integration: From Unified to Hybrid Approaches , 1996 .
[24] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..
[25] Suzanne Stevenson Paolo Merlo. Lexical structure and parsing complexity , 1997 .
[26] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .
[27] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility , 1998 .
[28] Suzanne Stevenson,et al. Parsing as Incremental Restructuring , 1998 .
[29] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[30] M. Pickering,et al. Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .
[31] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[32] Fernanda Ferreira,et al. Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .
[33] Martin J. Pickering,et al. The Modular Statistical Hypothesis: Exploring Lexical Category Ambiguity , 1999 .
[34] M. Pickering,et al. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing , 1999 .
[35] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Unrestricted race: A new model of syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2000 .
[36] Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .
[37] G. Kempen,et al. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar , 2000, Cognition.
[38] W. Snyder. An Experimental Investigation of Syntactic Satiation Effects , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.
[39] M W Crocker,et al. Wide-Coverage Probabilistic Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[40] C. Phillips,et al. Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .
[41] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .
[42] Colin Phillips,et al. Grammatical Search and Reanalysis , 2001 .
[43] K Christianson,et al. Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[44] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. The Preservation of Structure in Language Comprehension: Is Reanalysis the Last Resort? , 2001 .
[45] A. Hollingworth,et al. Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] Edward Gibson,et al. Syntactic Complexity in Ambiguity Resolution , 2002 .
[47] Forrest David Braze. Grammaticality, acceptability and sentence processing: A psycholinguistic study , 2002 .
[48] John Hale,et al. The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[49] C. Phillips. Linear Order and Constituency , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.
[50] W. Tabor,et al. Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.