Theorizing about group support systems

Theory is critical to science. Group support systems (GSS), as a field of scientific inquiry is no exception. The important issue about theory in GSS is then not why theory, but where should theory come from (or how should theory be developed) and how to assess it (or evaluate its usefulness). This paper expounds on these issues by considering various approaches to theorizing about GSS, and delves into prototypical efforts by the GSS research community under each approach. The typical theoretical product of each approach is analyzed in terms of its conceptual and logical structure, and pitted against the criteria of relevance (Thomas and Tymon, 1982). It is hoped that an increased awareness of the processes of theorizing and critical evaluation of the resulting theory substance would provide useful directions for promoting the development of better theory and hence advancing the state of GSS theory.

[1]  Janet Fulk,et al.  The Theory Imperative , 1990 .

[2]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[3]  Murray Turoff,et al.  On measuring the conceptual errors in large scale social experiments: The future as decision , 1974 .

[4]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[5]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Task and technology interaction (TTI): a theory of technological support for group tasks , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Ajaz R. Rana,et al.  Peer review process and group support systems: theory development and experimental validation , 1996 .

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[9]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[10]  R. John,et al.  A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy , 1980 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[12]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[13]  J. McGrath.  Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[14]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Modelling the process of GSS use: an adaptive structuration perspective , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[16]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[17]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[18]  M. McCall,et al.  Leadership: Where Else Can We Go? , 1979 .

[19]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  An experimental evaluation of GDSS effects on group performance during stakeholder analysis , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Ajaz R. Rana,et al.  Frameworks for Group Support Systems , 1997 .

[21]  Ajaz R. Rana,et al.  Group Support Systems and the Speech Act Theory , 1997 .

[22]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experimental studies of group decision support systems: an assessment of variables studied and methodology , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Inquiring Systems' Validation Approaches as Determinants of the Media Richness for Technology Supported Group Work , 1996 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Supporting group performance during stakeholder analysis: the effects of alternative computer-based designs , 1989 .

[27]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[28]  John B. Miner,et al.  The Validity and Usefulness of Theories in an Emerging Organizational Science , 1984 .

[29]  W. G. Tymon,et al.  Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences , 1982 .

[30]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[31]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[32]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes , 1974 .

[33]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[34]  R DennisAlan,et al.  A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems , 1990 .

[35]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[36]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..