Superpixel-level sparse representation-based classification for hyperspectral imagery

Sparse representation-based classification (SRC) assigns a test sample to the class with minimal representation error via a sparse linear combination of all the training samples, which has successfully been applied to hyperspectral imagery (HSI). Meanwhile, spatial information, that means the adjacent pixels belong to the same class with a high probability, is a valuable complement to the spectral information. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for HSI classification by using superpixel based sparse representation-based classification (SP-SRC). One superpixel can be regarded as a small region consisting of a number of pixels with similar spectral characteristics. The novel method utilizes superpixel to exploit spatial information which can greatly improve classification accuracy. Specifically, SRC is firstly used to classifier the HSI. Then an efficient segmentation algorithm is adopted to divide the HSI into disjoint superpixels. Finally, each superpixel is used to fuse the results of the SRC classifier. Experimental results on the widely-used Indian Pines hyperspectral imagery have shown that the proposed SP-SRC approach could achieve better performance than the pixel-wise SRC method.

[1]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[3]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[6]  Sven J. Dickinson,et al.  TurboPixels: Fast Superpixels Using Geometric Flows , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Fuchun Sun,et al.  A Fast and Robust Sparse Approach for Hyperspectral Data Classification Using a Few Labeled Samples , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Entropy rate superpixel segmentation , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[9]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using a New Bayesian Approach With Active Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  M. Salman Asif Primal dual pursuit: a homotopy based algorithm for the Dantzig selector , 2008 .

[11]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.