Using phase II data for the analysis of phase III studies: An application in rare diseases

Background: Clinical research and drug development in orphan diseases are challenging, since large-scale randomized studies are difficult to conduct. Formally synthesizing the evidence is therefore of great value, yet this is rarely done in the drug-approval process. Phase III designs that make better use of phase II data can facilitate drug development in orphan diseases. Methods: A Bayesian meta-analytic approach is used to inform the phase III study with phase II data. It is particularly attractive, since uncertainty of between-trial heterogeneity can be dealt with probabilistically, which is critical if the number of studies is small. Furthermore, it allows quantifying and discounting the phase II data through the predictive distribution relevant for phase III. A phase III design is proposed which uses the phase II data and considers approval based on a phase III interim analysis. The design is illustrated with a non-inferiority case study from a Food and Drug Administration approval in herpetic keratitis (an orphan disease). Design operating characteristics are compared to those of a traditional design, which ignores the phase II data. Results: An analysis of the phase II data reveals good but insufficient evidence for non-inferiority, highlighting the need for a phase III study. For the phase III study supported by phase II data, the interim analysis is based on half of the patients. For this design, the meta-analytic interim results are conclusive and would justify approval. In contrast, based on the phase III data only, interim results are inconclusive and require further evidence. Conclusion: To accelerate drug development for orphan diseases, innovative study designs and appropriate methodology are needed. Taking advantage of randomized phase II data when analyzing phase III studies looks promising because the evidence from phase II supports informed decision-making. The implementation of the Bayesian design is straightforward with public software such as R.

[1]  James G. Scott,et al.  On the half-cauchy prior for a global scale parameter , 2011, 1104.4937.

[2]  Heikki Joensuu,et al.  Phase II, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Activity of Imatinib in Treating Life-Threatening Malignancies Known to Be Associated with Imatinib-Sensitive Tyrosine Kinases , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  Gene Pennello,et al.  Experience with Reviewing Bayesian Medical Device Trials , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  S B Kaye,et al.  Herpes simplex keratitis. , 1996, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  Fang Chen,et al.  Use of historical control data for assessing treatment effects in clinical trials , 2014, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[6]  Dan Jackson,et al.  Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Wolfgang Köpcke,et al.  Clinical trials and rare diseases. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[8]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  F. J. Sasinowski,et al.  Quantum of Effectiveness Evidence in FDA’s Approval of Orphan Drugs: Update, July 2010 to June 2014 , 2015, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[10]  Lisa V Hampson,et al.  Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  P. Müller,et al.  Determining the Effective Sample Size of a Parametric Prior , 2008, Biometrics.

[12]  C. Dawson,et al.  Herpes simplex eye infections: clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and management. , 1976, Survey of ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Summarizing historical information on controls in clinical trials , 2010, Clinical trials.

[14]  Tim Friede,et al.  Meta‐analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases , 2016, Research synthesis methods.

[15]  F. J. Sasinowski,et al.  Quantum of Effectiveness Evidence in FDA’s Approval of Orphan Drugs , 2012 .

[16]  M. A. Best Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health‐Care Evaluation , 2005 .

[17]  Manas Tandon,et al.  Orphan drug: Development trends and strategies , 2010, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[18]  Martin Posch,et al.  Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions , 2016, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[19]  Steven Wang,et al.  Historical control monotherapy design in the treatment of epilepsy , 2010, Epilepsia.

[20]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Statistical Challenges in the Evaluation of Treatments for Small Patient Populations , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[21]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Robust meta‐analytic‐predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information , 2014, Biometrics.

[22]  Todd P. Margolis,et al.  Herpes Simplex Virus Keratitis: A Treatment Guideline , 2014 .

[23]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Determining optimal therapy--randomized trials in individual patients. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Timothy Y Chou,et al.  Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel 0.15% for the treatment of acute herpetic keratitis: background, effectiveness, tolerability, safety, and future applications , 2014, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[25]  D. Hughes,et al.  Rare Disease Terminology and Definitions-A Systematic Global Review: Report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[26]  Thomas Kuerner Essential rules and requirements for global clinical trials in rare lung diseases: a sponsor's standpoint. , 2015, Respiratory investigation.

[27]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Christian Roever,et al.  Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis , 2015 .

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[31]  D. Malec,et al.  A closer look at combining data among a small number of binomial experiments , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Suresh Ps,et al.  Herpes simplex keratitis. , 1999, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  Draft Guidance Guidance for Industry Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[34]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales by D. E. Warn, S. G. Thompson and D. J. Spiegelhalter, Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 1601–1623 , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  Tim Friede,et al.  Meta‐analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases , 2016, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[36]  Asim V. Farooq,et al.  Herpes simplex epithelial and stromal keratitis: an epidemiologic update. , 2012, Survey of ophthalmology.

[37]  Tim Friede,et al.  Doxycycline in early CJD: a double-blinded randomised phase II and observational study , 2016, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[38]  Heinz Schmidli,et al.  On the Use of Co-Data in Clinical Trials , 2016 .