Last year, in a guest editorial for the Library Quarterly (LQ) we proposed the concept of diversity by design (DbD) and posited it as a concept relevant to workplace environments, community engagements and graduate LIS education. We invited LQ readers “to contemplate whether this concept ma[de] sense to them and, if yes, how it work[ed] in their respective” situations [1: 88]. We brought to light “the multiplicity of contexts that give diversity meaning and life in our complex field” [ibid] and demonstrated that it was integral, rather than superfluous, to our field and way of being. Finally, we gave examples of how “discounting or underappreciating” diversity “may have a disintegrating effect on our practice, scholarship, and education” [ibid]. This poster will introduce the concept of DbD; provide examples of several case studies which show the difference between “diversity as a bonus” and “diversity by design”; and include feedback and insight from the DbD grant‐funded international symposium in Toronto, Canada, in September 2017.
[1]
Samantha Kelly Hastings.
If Diversity Is a Natural State, Why Don’t Our Libraries Mirror the Populations They Serve?*
,
2015,
The Library Quarterly.
[2]
Marc A Nivet,et al.
Diversity by design.
,
2013,
Journal of graduate medical education.
[3]
Paul T. Jaeger.
Disability, human rights, and social justice: The ongoing struggle for online accessibility and equality
,
2015,
First Monday.
[4]
Patricia Montiel Overall,et al.
Cultural Competence: A Conceptual Framework for Library and Information Science Professionals
,
2009,
The Library Quarterly.
[5]
Paul T. Jaeger,et al.
Modeling Inclusive Practice?: Attracting Diverse Faculty and Future Faculty to the Information Workforce
,
2010,
Libr. Trends.
[6]
D M Laskin,et al.
Can we talk?
,
1988,
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.