Impact of Mobile Sink for Wireless Sensor Networks Considering Different Radio Models and Performance Metrics

In this work, we investigate how WSN performs in the case when sink node moves using different radio models and metrics. We consider routing efficiency, delay and number of received packet metrics to evaluate the performance of WSN using AODV routing protocol, lattice topology, and TwoRayGround and Shadowing radio models. We evaluate the performance of WSN by simulations. The performance evaluation results show that for small number of sensor nodes, the RE of Shadowing radio model is better than TwoRayGround model. However, for high node density, the RE of TwoRayGround model is better than Shadowing radio model. When Tr is less 10, the delay of Shadowing model is better than TwoRayGround model. However, for Tr larger than 100, the delay of TwoRayGround model is better than Shadowing model. With increase of the number of nodes, the number of received packets is also increased. For TwoRayGround model, when Tr is less than 10, the number of received packets for 16, 64, and 100 nodes is almost the same. However, comparing TwoRayGround model with Shadowing model, for the same time interval and for the same number of nodes, the number of received packets of TwoRayGround model is better than Shadowing model.

[1]  S. Giodano,et al.  Topics in ad hoc and sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Controllably mobile infrastructure for low energy embedded networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Learning-enforced time domain routing to mobile sinks in wireless sensor fields , 2004, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[5]  Öznur Özkasap,et al.  Ad-Hoc Networks , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[6]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Wireless Communications , 2005, 2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS).

[7]  Leonard Barolli,et al.  Impact of radio randomness on performances of lattice wireless sensors networks based on event-reliability concept , 2006, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ossama Younis,et al.  HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[9]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Wireless Sensor Networks for Mobile Sink Considering Consumed Energy Metric , 2010, 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[10]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Topics in ad hoc and sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[11]  Jun Luo,et al.  Joint mobility and routing for lifetime elongation in wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[12]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[13]  K. Fodor,et al.  Electrostatic Modelling of Multiple Mobile Sinks in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006 .

[14]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Overload traffic management for sensor networks , 2007, TOSN.