MODELING CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND EXPLANATION FOR TWEETS BASED ON SENTIMENT ANALYSIS

Credibility is one of the main issues when dealing with information obtained from Online Social Networks (OSNs). Although a significant number of prior works have addressed many issues in this topic, only a few that have worked on methods for automatic credibility measurement for OSN messages and almost none who has addressed a specific problem in explaining the credibility information. This paper proposes a new approach for modeling credibility of tweets and explaining it to users. We model tweet credibility based on other independent tweet contents that support and oppose the topic issue in question. We also consider the opinions of tweets’ followers who either confirm or deny, along with their reputations. This method is based on assumption that the more community is who agree with the claim, the more credible is the claim. Explanation of the credibility measure is based on the tweet content itself. We provide users with representative tweets that can be progressively zoomed-in for more detail explanation. To achieve this goal, all tweets are hierarchically structured and tweet representatives on each node are selected from the ones that are most similar to the centroid. Our evaluation results indicate the feasibility of the proposed methods.

[1]  Sibel Adali,et al.  Credibility in Context: An Analysis of Feature Distributions in Twitter , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[2]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Rumor has it: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs , 2011, EMNLP.

[3]  Setsuo Tsuruta,et al.  Topic and Opinion Classification Based Information Credibility Analysis on Twitter , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Scott Counts,et al.  Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions , 2012, CSCW.

[5]  Barbara Rosario,et al.  What is disputed on the web? , 2010, WICOW '10.

[6]  Chao Wu,et al.  Information Credibility on Twitter in Emergency Situation , 2012, PAISI.

[7]  A. Diop Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , 2012 .

[8]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media , 2011, ICWSM.

[9]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information , 2010, CSCW '10.

[10]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams , 2010, WWW.

[11]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  TweetCred: A Real-time Web-based System for Assessing Credibility of Content on Twitter , 2014, ArXiv.

[13]  Vern Paxson,et al.  @spam: the underground on 140 characters or less , 2010, CCS '10.

[14]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Chao Yang,et al.  Empirical Evaluation and New Design for Fighting Evolving Twitter Spammers , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[16]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[17]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[18]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.

[19]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[20]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[21]  John Yen,et al.  Seeking the trustworthy tweet: Can microblogged data fit the information needs of disaster response and humanitarian relief organizations , 2011, ISCRAM.

[22]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[23]  Adam L. Kaczmarek Web Services Integration with Regard to the Metrics of Data Believability , 2012 .

[24]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness , 2010, CHI.

[25]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design , 2007, RecSys '07.

[26]  Scott Counts,et al.  Microblog credibility perceptions: comparing the USA and China , 2013, CSCW.