Autofocals: Evaluating gaze-contingent eyeglasses for presbyopes

Modern presbyopia corrections exhibit unnatural refocusing behavior; we build and evaluate autofocal eyeglasses to improve them. As humans age, they gradually lose the ability to accommodate, or refocus, to near distances because of the stiffening of the crystalline lens. This condition, known as presbyopia, affects nearly 20% of people worldwide. We design and build a new presbyopia correction, autofocals, to externally mimic the natural accommodation response, combining eye tracker and depth sensor data to automatically drive focus-tunable lenses. We evaluated 19 users on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and a refocusing task. Autofocals exhibit better visual acuity when compared to monovision and progressive lenses while maintaining similar contrast sensitivity. On the refocusing task, autofocals are faster and, compared to progressives, also significantly more accurate. In a separate study, a majority of 23 of 37 users ranked autofocals as the best correction in terms of ease of refocusing. Our work demonstrates the superiority of autofocals over current forms of presbyopia correction and could affect the lives of millions.

[1]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[2]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Task and Visual Performance with Concentric Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  Zengzhuo Li,et al.  Eye Tracker with Distance Measurement for Autofocus Eyeglass , 2016 .

[4]  Philip B. Morgan,et al.  Switchable Liquid Crystal Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia , 2018 .

[5]  M Mäntyjärvi,et al.  Normal values for the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity test , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Vision and Task Performance with Monovision and Diffractive Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  P Erickson,et al.  Visual Function with Presbyopic Contact Lens Correction , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  S. Haugland,et al.  Falls in the elderly , 1992, The Lancet.

[9]  Hanseup Kim,et al.  Adaptive Optics for Autofocusing Eyeglasses , 2017 .

[10]  Hanseup Kim,et al.  A Low-Profile Digital Eye-Tracking Oculometer for Smart Eyeglasses , 2018, 2018 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI).

[11]  Sheng Liu,et al.  An optical see-through head mounted display with addressable focal planes , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[12]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Saccade landing position prediction for gaze-contingent rendering , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  Yi-Hsin Lin,et al.  Electrically tunable-focusing and polarizer-free liquid crystal lenses for ophthalmic applications. , 2013, Optics express.

[14]  Kenneth J Ciuffreda,et al.  Assessing Visual Performance with Progressive Addition Lenses , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Hongrui Jiang,et al.  Biomedical applications of tunable liquid lenses , 2015, 2015 IEEE SENSORS.

[16]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  Temporal multiplexing with adaptive optics for simultaneous vision. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  Vitor F. Pamplona,et al.  NETRA: interactive display for estimating refractive errors and focal range , 2010 .

[18]  Hiromasa Oku,et al.  A pair of diopter-adjustable eyeglasses for presbyopia correction , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[19]  Yi-Hsin Lin,et al.  Electrically Tunable Liquid Crystal Lenses and Applications , 2014 .

[20]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Optimizing virtual reality for all users through gaze-contingent and adaptive focus displays , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Genís Cardona,et al.  Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia , 2015, Journal of optometry.

[22]  Eric B. Papas,et al.  Monovision vs. soft diffractive bifocal contact lenses: A crossover study , 1990 .

[23]  C. Mastrangelo,et al.  Tunable-focus lens for adaptive eyeglasses. , 2017, Optics express.

[24]  A Back,et al.  Comparative Visual Performance of Three Presbyopic Contact Lens Corrections , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  Karol Myszkowski,et al.  Wide Field Of View Varifocal Near-Eye Display Using See-Through Deformable Membrane Mirrors , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Accommodation-invariant computational near-eye displays , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[27]  Robert Stevens,et al.  A review of adjustable lenses for head mounted displays , 2017, Other Conferences.

[28]  Guoqiang Li,et al.  Switchable electro-optic diffractive lens with high efficiency for ophthalmic applications. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Novel Optical Configurations for Virtual Reality: Evaluating User Preference and Performance with Focus-tunable and Monovision Near-eye Displays , 2016, CHI.

[30]  T. Ghosh,et al.  Lightweight smart autofocusing eyeglasses , 2018, OPTO.

[31]  Roberta A. Newton,et al.  Balance and Falls among Older People , 2003 .

[32]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  FocusAR: Auto-focus Augmented Reality Eyeglasses for both Real World and Virtual Imagery , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[33]  Andreas Bulling,et al.  Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[34]  Yi-Hsin Lin,et al.  Electrically Tunable Ophthalmic Lenses for Myopia and Presbyopia Using Liquid Crystals , 2014 .

[35]  Christopher D. Saunter,et al.  Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort , 2015, Optics express.

[36]  W Neil Charman,et al.  Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[37]  Alexander Duane,et al.  NORMAL VALUES OF THE ACCOMMODATION AT ALL AGES , 1912 .

[38]  L. W. Alvarez TWO-ELEMENT WARIABLE-POWER SPHERICAL LENS , 2017 .

[39]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Navier-stokes, fluid dynamics, and image and video inpainting , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[40]  W Neil Charman,et al.  Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[41]  Aruna S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Visual Performance of Subjects Wearing Presbyopic Contact Lenses , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[43]  S. Lord,et al.  Multifocal Glasses Impair Edge‐Contrast Sensitivity and Depth Perception and Increase the Risk of Falls in Older People , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[44]  Hong Hua,et al.  Video-based eyetracking methods and algorithms in head-mounted displays. , 2006, Optics express.

[45]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[46]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Monovision Contact Lens Wear and Occupational Task Performance , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[47]  Anthea M Burnett,et al.  Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.