Handling time varying confounding in observational research

Many exposures of epidemiological interest are time varying, and the values of potential confounders may change over time leading to time varying confounding. The aim of many longitudinal studies is to estimate the causal effect of a time varying exposure on an outcome that requires adjusting for time varying confounding. Time varying confounding affected by previous exposure often occurs in practice, but it is usually adjusted for by using conventional analytical methods such as time dependent Cox regression, random effects models, or generalised estimating equations, which are known to provide biased effect estimates in this setting. This article explains time varying confounding affected by previous exposure and outlines three causal methods proposed to appropriately adjust for this potential bias: inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting, the parametric G formula, and G estimation.

[1]  James M. Robins,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999 .

[2]  J. Pearl,et al.  Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference , 1999 .

[3]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[4]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[5]  S. Greenland.  Quantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias , 2003, Epidemiology.

[6]  J. Robins,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/pds.1064 , 2022 .

[7]  Romain Neugebauer,et al.  An application of model-fitting procedures for marginal structural models. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  S. Cole,et al.  Overadjustment Bias and Unnecessary Adjustment in Epidemiologic Studies , 2009, Epidemiology.

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  Intervening on risk factors for coronary heart disease: an application of the parametric g-formula. , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Causal Inference , 2010 .

[11]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal Inference , 2011, Twenty-one Mental Models That Can Change Policing.

[12]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Kazem Mohammad,et al.  Effect of Physical Activity on Functional Performance and Knee Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis: Analysis With Marginal Structural Models , 2012, Epidemiology.

[14]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Matched designs and causal diagrams. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Roger Logan,et al.  Observational data for comparative effectiveness research: An emulation of randomised trials of statins and primary prevention of coronary heart disease , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[16]  M. Mansournia,et al.  Marginal versus conditional causal effects , 2015 .

[17]  S. Greenland,et al.  The relation of collapsibility and confounding to faithfulness and stability. , 2015, Epidemiology.

[18]  S. Greenland,et al.  Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[19]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[20]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Inverse probability weighting , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[21]  Kazem Mohammad,et al.  Standardization as a Tool for Causal Inference in Medical Research. , 2016, Archives of Iranian medicine.

[22]  M. Mansournia,et al.  Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error. , 2016, Annals of epidemiology.

[23]  Edward H Kennedy,et al.  An introduction to g methods. , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists. , 2017, Epidemiology.

[25]  M. Mansournia,et al.  Accounting for Time-Varying Confounding in the Relationship Between Obesity and Coronary Heart Disease: Analysis With G-Estimation The ARIC Study , 2018, American journal of epidemiology.