CyberKnife Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Lesions: Clinical Experience in 125 Cases

OBJECTIVE:The role of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of intracranial lesions is well established. Its use for the treatment of spinal lesions has been limited by the availability of effective target-immobilizing devices. Conventional external beam radiotherapy lacks the precision to allow delivery of large doses of radiation near radiosensitive structures such as the spinal cord. The CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is an image-guided frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system that allows for the radiosurgical treatment of spinal lesions. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of the treatment of spinal lesions with a single-fraction radiosurgical technique using the CyberKnife. METHODS:The CyberKnife system uses the coupling of an orthogonal pair of x-ray cameras to a dynamically manipulated robot-mounted linear accelerator with six degrees of freedom that guides the therapy beam to the intended target without the use of frame-based fixation. Real-time imaging allows the tracking of patient movement. Cervical spine lesions were located and tracked relative to cranial bony landmarks; lower spinal lesions were tracked relative to fiducial bone markers. In this prospective cohort evaluation of a spine radiosurgery technique, 125 spinal lesions in 115 consecutive patients were treated with a single-fraction radiosurgery technique (45 cervical, 30 thoracic, 36 lumbar, and 14 sacral). There were 17 benign tumors and 108 metastatic lesions. All dose plans were calculated on the basis of computed tomographic images acquired from 1.25-mm slices with an inverse treatment planning technique. Radiosurgical circular cones ranging in diameter from 5 to 40 mm were used. RESULTS:Tumor volume ranged from 0.3 to 232 cm3 (mean, 27.8 cm3). Seventy-eight lesions had received external beam irradiation previously. Tumor dose was maintained at 12 to 20 Gy to the 80% isodose line (mean, 14 Gy); canal volume receiving more than 8 Gy ranged from 0.0 to 1.7 cm3 (mean, 0.2 cm3). No acute radiation toxicity or new neurological deficits occurred during the follow-up period (range, 9–30 mo; median, 18 mo). Axial and radicular pain improved in 74 of 79 patients who were symptomatic before treatment. CONCLUSION:This is the first large prospective evaluation of this frameless image-guided spinal radiosurgery system. The CyberKnife system was found to be feasible, safe, and effective. The major potential benefits of radiosurgical ablation of spinal lesions are short treatment time in an outpatient setting with rapid recovery and symptomatic response. This technique offers a successful therapeutic modality for the treatment of a variety of spinal lesions as a primary treatment or for lesions not amenable to open surgical techniques, in medically inoperable patients, in lesions located in previously irradiated sites, or as an adjunct to surgery.

[1]  R. K. Goldsen,et al.  Some factors related to patient delay in seeking diagnosis for cancer symptoms , 1957, Cancer.

[2]  T. Phillips,et al.  Radiation tolerance of the thoracic spinal cord. , 1969, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[3]  T. Phillips,et al.  Radiation tolerance of the spinal cord , 1975, Cancer.

[4]  T. Delozier,et al.  Radiation myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord: time, dose and volume factors. , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Y. Kim,et al.  Radiation tolerance of the cervical spinal cord. , 1981, Radiology.

[6]  R. Hatlevoll,et al.  Myelopathy following radiotherapy of bronchial carcinoma with large single fractions: a retrospective study. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing a linear accelerator. , 1985, Applied neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Dalton,et al.  Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery. , 1989, British journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  A J McCunniff,et al.  Radiation tolerance of the cervical spinal cord. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery. Initial North American experience in 207 patients. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[11]  P. Wen,et al.  The treatment of recurrent brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas. , 1999, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[13]  J. Adler,et al.  Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  J R Adler,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  J R Adler,et al.  Computer-assisted preoperative planning, interactive surgery, and frameless stereotaxy. , 1992, Clinical neurosurgery.

[17]  L D Lunsford,et al.  A multi-institutional experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for solitary brain metastasis. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery , 1994, Modelling and Planning for Sensor Based Intelligent Robot Systems.

[19]  Linear accelerator radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an update. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[20]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Preliminary clinical experience with linear accelerator-based spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[21]  F J Bova,et al.  Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  M J Murphy,et al.  The accuracy of dose localization for an image-guided frameless radiosurgery system. , 1996, Medical physics.

[23]  M J Murphy,et al.  The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. , 1997, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[24]  J. Adler,et al.  Clinical uses of radiosurgery. , 1998, Oncology.

[25]  N. Laperriere,et al.  Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Long-term outcomes after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery: Clinical and Radiographic Results with the CyberKnife , 2000 .

[29]  Gerszten Pc,et al.  Current surgical management of metastatic spinal disease. , 2000 .

[30]  Steven D Chang,et al.  Image-guided Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Spinal Lesions , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[31]  I Gibbs,et al.  Image-guided radiosurgery in the treatment of spinal metastases. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[32]  J. Adler,et al.  Current status and optimal use of radiosurgery. , 2001, Oncology.

[33]  S. Kalnicki,et al.  Feasibility of frameless single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal lesions. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[34]  Steven D Chang,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife: A Robotic Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgical System , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[35]  John C. Flickinger,et al.  The use of radiation in the management of spinal metastases , 2005, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.